Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

University cuts men's running programs

Officials cite Title IX; athletes left in limbo

Published: Wednesday, January 19, 2011

Updated: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 23:01

cross country

File photo

The men's cross country team is being changed from varsity to club, as is the men's track and field team.

men's track protest

James Diana

A group of students, including some members of the men's track team, protest the university's decsion during a basketball game at the Bob Carpenter Center Jan. 24.


The university will reclassify the men's cross country and outdoor track teams from varsity to club status in order to comply with Title IX regulations, officials announced Wednesday. The change will take effect this fall.

"There were a number of options we looked at and in the end, this was the best alternative," Athletic Director Bernard Muir said. "It was a difficult decision nonetheless, because you're impacting the lives of people who wanted to be varsity athletes and wear the uniform here."

The portion of Title IX legislation relevant to athletics was passed in 1979 and mandates a three-pronged approach to gender equality in athletic programs.

In order to comply with Title IX, schools must do one of the following: offer varsity-level athletic opportunities that are proportionate to the gender distribution at the school, demonstrate that they have and will continue to increase varsity programs for the underrepresented gender, or provide for the interests and abilities of the underrepresented gender.

Muir said the change would help the university better adhere to the first part of the law, commonly referred to as the proportionality prong, and therefore be more in compliance with Title IX.

The announcement, which Muir said will affect 38 athletes, comes two years after the university reclassified men's indoor track from varsity to club. When the university was considering the indoor track decision, officials let the team and the public know the move was possible long before the final verdict was announced.

"There was a big public outcry at the time," said Tim Brock, a 2008 alumnus of both teams who is now a graduate assistant track and cross country coach at North Carolina State. "A lot of moves were made. The administration was contacted. I think there were actually a few different meetings with the alumni and the UD administration."

But the university running community did not have that chance this time.

Neither Head Coach Jim Fischer nor the members of teams were made aware of the decision until just before it was announced to the public. The teams were notified via e-mail at approximately 8:30 a.m. Wednesday, and Fischer received the news the night before.

"I didn't see it coming," Fischer said. "It was just a real surprise."

Junior cross country captain Andy Weaver said he felt blindsided by the announcement and was upset the team was not included in the decision-making process.

"It just seems like there are some holes in what they're telling us here. There's Title IX, and there's the money, and the two are kind of intertwined," Weaver said. "We just kind of feel betrayed by it."

At 3 p.m. Wednesday, Muir met with the teams to further explain the reasons behind the reclassification and to listen to students' opinions and concerns. Muir said the administration chose to send out an e-mail first so students would have time to gather their thoughts before the meeting.

Weaver said it will be difficult for students who choose to remain at the university to remain competitive, especially in cross country. Although club track and field members would be eligible for most regular-season meets, there are few varsity cross country meets in which club teams complete, he said.

Sophomore Dan Feeney, a member of both teams, said he will consider transferring in order to continue his running career, but that the decision would be a difficult one.

"I'm up in the air," Feeney said. "I've been in contact with a few coaches from other schools, but at the same time, I'm halfway through my major and it's hard to break into the niche that I have here and try to get into other schools."

Students who are on scholarship and choose to remain at the university will continue to receive their scholarship, as per NCAA regulations. If a student transfers to another university, the decision to provide financial aid is up to that school.

Combined, the two programs have a budget of more than $300,000, Muir said. Scholarships make up the largest percentage of the budget, Fischer said.

"The budgets are better than what they have been," Fischer said. "They've been doing some things to try to help us out and maybe that was our undoing, I don't know."

Feeney said in the two years he has been on the team, he has noticed a reduction in the gear the university provides for the runners. During his freshman year, each member was compensated for one pair of shoes.

"Now, it's three-quarters of a pair of shoes," he said.

Fischer, who has been the men's and women's track and cross country coach since 1982, will continue to coach the women's track and cross country teams and said he would like to remain involved with the men's club teams as well.

"I don't know what shape it will take. I don't know if there will be as much interest because some guys were running club to try to improve their skills and try to be on the varsity next year," he said. "Without that motivation, I don't know if there will be the same impetus to be on the team next year."

Jimmy Daly, a 2008 alumnus, said being a varsity runner was a key part of his college experience and was about more than competition.

"To a lot of people, running is not very exciting—it's more of a punishment—but to those people who it's really important to, it's a big part of their lives and its unfortunate that those guys aren't going to have the same kind of experience we did," Daly said.

Brock, who previously coached high school cross country at The Tatnall School in Greenville, Del., said the decision affects many more people than those already on the team and their friends and families.

"What this is doing is it's making the high schoolers search elsewhere," Brock said. "[They will say] 'I can't go to my state institution and run and make that institution better. I've represented my state well, so the next logical step should be to go to my state institution and make that better.'"

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

13 comments

Anonymous
Mon Feb 7 2011 12:03
Why can't University of Delaware make cuts accross the board instead of cutting two programs completely?

CAA Rosters for Football greatest to least - Football- Delaware 105, W&M 97, UNH 96, JMU 92, UMASS, 90, Maine 84, Richmond 83, Villanova 82, Towson 77, RI 76
There are 5 recent national champs from this conference and Delaware is the only one over 100 men. Drop some and Track and XC would have a program!!

CAA Rosters for Soccer greatest to least Soccer- JMU 32, Delaware 29, Towson 28, Drexel 27, Northeastern 27, W&M 26, VCU 25, Georgia State 22, George Mason 15

You have the second biggest roster and the best you finished in 12 years is 4th? Drop some and we would have a program.

CAA Rosters for Lacrosse greatest to least Lacrosse- Delaware 51, St. Joes 49, Towson 48, Hofstra 45, Drexel 41, UMass 40, Penn State 35

Why do we need to have a 51 man roster for Lacrosse again? Drop some and Track and XC would have a program!

CAA Rosters for Basketball greatest to least Basketball- Delaware 16, Georgia State 15, JMU 14, VCU 14, George Mason (FINAL FOUR TEAM a couple years back) 14, Hofstra 14, UNCW 13, ODU 13 (Defending champs), W&M 13, Towson 13, Northeastern 12, Drexel 12 (upset Louisville from Big East)!

George Mason was a FINAL FOUR TEAM and their team today has 14. Drop a couple UD and we would have a program.

Again I ask why does UD feel that they can't cut a few people from each roster instead of cutting two programs completely?

Anonymous
Thu Jan 27 2011 12:15
This is terrible, this is not why Title IX was put into place. Title IX is there to make sure there to make sure women sports get a fair chance and receive proper funding. This is proportionality. Also, cross country is one of the cheapest sports for a University to carry. There is no stadium, no stadium maintenance. Its not like football where the uniforms cost hundreds of dollars. All you need is a pair of shoes and a road beneath your feet and you have a team.

While basketball may bring in more money than cross country, think about how much it costs just to maintain a basketball arena and all the employees they must pay in order to operate a home basketball game.

As an alumni of Delaware I am ashamed to hear that my school has forced out the men's cross country team. I wonder where the money saved from cutting these teams will go; I hope The Review keeps a close watch on any increase in funding to the football program.

Delaware's Finest
Wed Jan 26 2011 00:30
I can assure you that every meet the cross country and track team hosts each year (about 10 meets, including the high school meets) make AND attract more people than any of the basketball games.
Its a shame the school continues to waste funds on the basketball team. They have gotten 12th place aka LAST PLACE in the CAA twice in the last 6 years. The track and cross country teams have not done worst then 7th in the CAA.
Cross Country and track are self funded teams. The meets the teams host practically fund the team, and the school give little to no money. Each athlete provides his own shoes to train in and race in. Everything given to the team must be returned. Extra money in tutoring isn't necessary since many of these kids are on the honor roll. How many scholarships do these teams have? Less than 6 scholarships for a roster of about 40 athletes.
Basketball can't even fill a quarter of the Bob. The school funds this team almost completely. These athletes are given free shoes of their choice, "fresh" clothes and gear they can keep, and way more than 6 scholarships for a 16 man roster. The University also has to put an extra pretty penny in to pay for tutors for these athletes.
Ripping on other teams isn't the best way to do things but when you have people that make false statements (Anonymous Fri Jan 21 2011 00:52) than things can get out of hand and than people like myself like to educate a fool.
Anonymous
Tue Jan 25 2011 22:49
cut one basketball player (18,000+ per year individually) & that alone with fund the entire cross country team (13,000+ per season) & then some track spots. *stats from the department of education, 2010
Anonymous
Tue Jan 25 2011 21:05
Im a Delaware High School runner and was looking forward to being able to have the chance to run at U.D. and now that the running program is no longer with us I dont even care anymore about whether I get accepted to U.D. anymore because I want to go where I can run. I feel bad for the kids who came to U.D. for a scholarship for running and are now being turned away. I know if someone took away competition from me I would be pissed. It seems like Young Delaware runners like myself have been losing opportunities to run such as the Indoor Track at Tower Hill being closed.
Anonymous
Tue Jan 25 2011 19:29
No sports at delaware are "money-makers'. Football and Basketball by far generate the most revenue, but they also have the highest costs by far, and certainly don't make a profit. This decision is very unfortunate as both the Title 9 and money reasons seem to not "add up". UD certainly wasn't in any danger of being out of compliance with title 9 since they had just added women's golf, and cut men's indoor track. Not to mention that no school in the country has actually had federal funds taken away from them as a result of being out of compliance with Title 9 as far as I'm aware of. Everything is pointing to Title 9 just being an excuse to save money. But in comparison with the other sports' budgets, the money UD is saving by this move is POCKET CHANGE. Something doesn't make any sense, and I for one don't think that the AD and the Administration is being fully honest with us. This decision really brings shame and embarrassment on UD.
Anonymous
Tue Jan 25 2011 09:14
sounds like they're *running* out of money.
Anonymous
Tue Jan 25 2011 08:36
The UD has never been cited by the NCAA for a violation of Title 9. This is an administrative decision to cut costs. The fact that men's track and cross country are amongst the lowest cost sports makes it difficult to see why they were chosen. The concept of scholar athletes is particularly true of these sports as many of the team members are excellent scholars as well. It is a shame for the UD that they do not appear to care about that aspect of NCAA sports. Track and field has been a stable at all levels of colleges for decades, in part, because the costs are so low and many individuals can participate.
Anonymous
Tue Jan 25 2011 07:38
This is not what Title IX should be about...
Anonymous
Sun Jan 23 2011 08:58
If offering sports at the college and highschool level were about breaking even or making money then there would be few if any sports offered.

It is giving kids as many opportunities to be challenged athlectically based on their interests and passion.

it's not just a cooincidence that these athletes are also strong acedemic students.

Anonymous
Fri Jan 21 2011 10:15
All that money goes right back into their operating costs. They don't even come close to breaking even.
Anonymous
Fri Jan 21 2011 00:52
I can assure you basketball makes more money in ticket sales than cross country.
Anonymous
Fri Jan 21 2011 00:08
Why not cut Men's Basketball? No one pays attention to the Hens and they have not been all that great in basketball.






log out