Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Students protest anti-abortion rally

Counter-protest draws a mix of serious and humorous signs

Published: Friday, April 23, 2010

Updated: Friday, April 23, 2010 04:04

counterprotest 9

Erica Cohen

Students rally in front of Gore Hall Thursday to protest an anti-abortion demonstration set up on The Green.

"Students of Delaware, do you know the definition of genocide?" junior Allison Landry shouted from the steps of Gore Hall on Thursday at a counter-protest organized in reaction to an anti-abortion display on The Green by a national advocacy group.

Landry, and a crowd of more than 200 students, gathered in front of Center for Bioethical Reform's display to protest the use of graphic images and the parallels to genocide made by posters set up by CBR.

The students stood held posters with messages both humorous and serious - "Stop Genocide - pull out," "Against Abortion, Don't get One," "Truth, Let's start an intelligent conversation," and "Pro-Dance," held up by the cast of HTAC's play, Footloose.

The displays had raised a question about free speech on campus, and students with both viewpoints gathered around Gore Hall to argue about the use of the images and speak with students and community members about similar issues.

The registered student organization Pro-Life Vanguard brought CBR to campus. Representatives from the California-based CBR travel to college campuses around the country displaying large photos of aborted fetuses.

"This shows people when they are discussing abortion, this is what it looks like," said Gina Paladinetti, vice president of the RSO.

Corey Bart, who organized the counter-protest through a Facebook group, said it was not a pro-life vs. pro-choice debate but rather a disagreement with the tactics used by CBR.

"I was shocked and offended," Bart said. "I don't approve of the methods used at all."

The counter-protested was organized after some students took offense at CBR's display on Wednesday, the beginning of CBR's two-day protest at the university.

Other students have called the office of student life to voice concerns about the advocacy group being allowed access to The Green.

Scott Mason, associate director of student centers, said the group was allowed because it was sponsored by Pro-Life Vanguard, which applied for permits to display posters on The Green.

"Like other RSOs, they filled out a request to reserve the Green for a space in which to present their event," Mason stated in an e-mail message. "The Green may be reserved by any department or recognized student organization at UD."

The university has received varied feedback about the protest, Mason said.

"Students, staff, faculty and community concerns pertaining to the content of the display are appreciated and many different administrators have been contacted with such concerns," he said. "However, there have also been students that have written stating that though they do not like the display, they appreciate the support of free speech."

Mason emphasized the university's sensitivity to the right of freedom of speech and personal and academic freedom.

"[The university] is committed to creating an educational community that is intellectually, culturally and socially inclusive," he said.

Sophomore Heidi Lieberman agreed the First Amendment should be respected, but believed more warnings should have been placed around campus to let students know what they would be seeing.

"I respect their opinion, but they went around this the wrong way," Lieberman said. 

Others thought the pictures were necessary to get the point across.

"I feel like we should know what's going on," sophomore Laura Dodd said. "If people will see them, they'll start thinking about what abortion really is."

CBR had 15 representatives at the university and had a debate team around the project to discuss and argue with students.

"The pictures are graphic because abortion is graphic," said Mark Harrington, a representative of the group. "The pictures are just a depiction of the act of abortion, we're not embellishing anything.

Other students took issue with CBR's comparisons of abortion to genocide, the Holocaust and lynchings.

"Comparing abortion to the Holocaust is offensive to so many people," sophomore Hannah Niedal said.

As Niedel spoke, she wrote a message on the "free speech board" set up near the protest. "My body, my choice," she wrote.

Despite her anger, Niedel was able to find a positive thing about the event.

"I've never seen the school so passionate about something," she said. "It's cool to see students come out and protest against something they think is wrong."

 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

14 comments

Anonymous
Tue Sep 21 2010 22:02
Well what would would you call it then? A HUGE group of people , 44 million and counting, are being slaughtered in the womb? Sounds like genocide to me. That's why we don't want to see the reality of the pictures. I don't like the pictures either but it shows the truth. Not the "compassion" that Planned Parenthood and the like are dealing out. Not to mention the suffering that the mother goes through after ending the life of her baby. That, my dear friends, stays with a woman forever. Only with Gods grace, mercy and love, does that wound heal.
Anonymous
Tue Sep 21 2010 22:01
Well what would would you call it then? A HUGE group of people , 44 million and counting, are being slaughtered in the womb? Sounds like genocide to me. That's why we don't want to see the reality of the pictures. I don't like the pictures either but it shows the truth. Not the "compassion" that Planned Parenthood and the like are dealing out. Not to mention the suffering that the mother goes through after ending the life of her baby. That, my dear friends, stays with a woman forever. Only with Gods grace, mercy and love, does that wound heal.
Anonymous
Tue Apr 27 2010 22:26
Comments from this article have been deleted... I posted a comment on both articles and the one here was deleted. I guess pro-lifers are allowed freedom of speech when displaying disgusting photographs on the Green and drawing comparisons between events that are completely different, but those of us who are pro-choice and find fault with this protest are not allowed to voice our opinions. Maybe it's pointless to even write this since the review will probably delete it.
Anonymous
Tue Apr 27 2010 14:03
The most surprising thing about this is that there was an actual protest on campus. At the least there were people who cared enough about something to actually get out there. Sure it was pretty gross, no one can argue that those pictures are pretty. But to call a protest that differs from your view "offensive and hurtful" is downright ignorant. Id like to see you college democrats out there just the same, protesting for whatever your views are. Oh thats right, John Stewart and Keith Olberman haven't told you to do that yet.
Miriam
Fri Apr 23 2010 17:25
Some victims of genocide (or their families and descendants) would find this kind of display offensive. However, many of them would agree completely with the message.

There are several Black pro-life organizations who adamantly insist that the comparison between slavery/lynching and abortion is completely valid. I have met Black women who became involved in the pro-life movement because they have seen what abortion has done, in particular, to the Black community. These organizations have pamphlets with titles like, "In the new Klan, lynching is for amateurs."

There are also Jewish rabbis who believe that abortion is a modern-day Holocaust.

So, some Blacks, Jews, etc. may be offended by the comparison. But others will agree with it. In the end, a person's response to a display such as CBR's is generally determined by their personal politics and ideology, not whether or not their ancestors were victims of "real" genocide.

Anonymous
Fri Apr 23 2010 16:07
the comments are on the other article. see "related articles" at the top. Notice how this is a different article about a different topic. Pretty idiotic for an "intelligent" person
Anonymous
Fri Apr 23 2010 15:00
A Planned Parenthood clinic director in TX quit her job after seeing an ultrasound of an abortion she was helping with (see youtube won't let me post a link here but Planned Parenthood director quits should get it).
Also Dr. Bernard Nathanson who was a founding member of NARAL and personally did 5,000 abortions became pro-life due to ultrasound and the advances in prenatal care.
Anonymous
Fri Apr 23 2010 14:49
There are differences between abortion, slavery and the Holocaust, but what is in common is denying personhood to a human being. Though I am pro-life and generally support the display, there could have been more nuances presented. I would have preferred more statistics and other facts about abortion on the posters myself. For example, I would bring up thing like: Ultrasound -- most women who view an ultrasound of their unborn baby decide against abortion.
Anonymous
Fri Apr 23 2010 13:53
all i'm saying is that misleading people isn't cool, under the guise of free speech or not. the fact that someone is allowed to say it doesn't mean i can't disagree with it. i never advocated removing the display, so i'm not sure where the irony is.
Anonymous
Fri Apr 23 2010 12:22
really? you say you agree with free speech but not if it's something you think is incorrect....irony at its greatest
Anonymous
Fri Apr 23 2010 11:35
free speech does apply to everyone, but that doesn't mean equating genocide with abortion is anywhere near correct or appropriate. honestly i don't care about the images, it's the misleading nature of the display. "abortion=genocide" is not a cute hyperbole, it's wrong and offensive to REAL victims of genocide.
Anonymous
Fri Apr 23 2010 09:46
Funny how we talk about free speech and comments on here are censored.
Anonymous
Fri Apr 23 2010 07:56
Hey where'd all the other good comments go? There were many intelligent responses on her here last night... Tracy M.
Anonymous
Fri Apr 23 2010 07:31
It's good that a controversial event took place. It gets people to think and express their views--this is what college should be like. Free speech applies to everyone, no matter how offensive or disturbing that speech might be. As soon as we censor in any way one group or person, we've set the precedent for doing the same to any other group or individual. So, to those who think this group should not have been allowed, take into consideration the consequences of censorship. Anything that gets people talking and debating is a good thing.






log out