Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Abortion protest sparks debate

Demonstrators to return Thursday, be met by counter-protest

Published: Thursday, April 22, 2010

Updated: Thursday, April 22, 2010 04:04

abortion protest

Alyssa Benedetto

Protesters from the anti-abortion group Center for Bio-Ethical Reform demonstarted on The Green Wednesday

The Green outside of Gore Hall was transformed into a political war zone Wednesday when the anti-abortion group Center for Bio-Ethical Reform brought its Genocide Awareness Project to the university.

The California-based advocacy group travels around the country displaying its GAP posters on college campuses. It was invited to the university by the registered student organization Pro-Life Vanguard.

Signs on The Green featured pictures of bloody, aborted fetuses as well as pictures of Holocaust victims and a lynched black man. Kurt Linnemann, director of CBR Maryland, said the display is meant to make the point that abortion is comparable to historical genocide.

Many students were visibly angered by the display and voiced their points of view either out loud by the display or by writing them on free speech board.

"Our purpose is to provoke thought and conversation on abortion," Linnemann said.

The posters compare abortion to events like the Holocaust in order to make an impact of witnesses, Linnemann said.

"[The display] causes them to ponder if they really want to go through [an abortion]," he said.

Frank Diorio, a protester from CBR, said images are the best option because there are no words to describe abortion.

"I'm here to speak on the behalf of those that don't get to walk the campus," Diorio said. 

He compared the abortion photos to photos of body bags used to protest the Vietnam War and to photos of violence against demonstrators that were used to expose injustices during the civil rights movement.

 "When enough hearts and minds have changed the law will be changed," Diorio said.

Junior Randi Bass said the display went going too far. She said the images are imposing on students' rights because the GAP is forcing its opinion on them.

"It's disturbing," Bass said.

Bass was also angry at the use of Holocaust photos to compare abortion to genocide.  She said genocide and abortion are unrelated topics. They are both bad but not the same thing, Bass said.

"It becomes racially insensitive," she said.

Senior Christina Rizzo said she did not like the pictures of Holocaust victims and a hanging man being held up as a comparison to abortion.

"I'm just shell shocked," Rizzo said.

She thought the display was insensitive to women who have had abortions.

"What if you were a woman who had an abortion because you had no choice," Rizzo said.  "How would you feel having to look at that?"  

 Junior Derek Sherman said he does not see any harm in the display because the protesters were simply voicing an opinion.

"Everyone has freedom of speech," Sherman said. "I don't know how necessary it is to have the pictures so big, but I guess it gets the point across."

The CBR protesters will return to The Green Thursday from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. According to a Facebook group organized Wednesday night, they will be met by a group of students holding a counter-protest.

 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

13 comments

Anonymous
Sun Jun 19 2011 23:54
People who have abortions DO HAVE CHOICES!

To say that someone "has no other choice" is very close minded. At the time, it may seem that there are few options, or preferred options. To continue to say that is ignorant and hopeless, perpetuating what many who already posted here - is a bad thing.

There are a variety of options. Education is the first step in understanding when life begins. Then, careful consideration can lead a woman to what they can do. The same consideration should take place before hand as well. And men need to consider the same- 'what if we get pregnant...'?

Violence against women - threats and actual - are highest during pregnancy. Are we to allow this? Or teach our society how wrong it is. That is what pro-life and pro-women means....

Anonymous
Tue Apr 27 2010 14:11
The most surprising thing about this is that there was an actual protest on campus. At the least there were people who cared enough about something to actually get out there. Sure it was pretty gross, no one can argue that those pictures are pretty. But to call a protest that differs from your view "offensive and hurtful" is downright ignorant. Id like to see you college democrats out there just the same, protesting for whatever your views are. Oh thats right, John Stewart and Keith Olberman haven't told you to do that yet.
Anonymous
Fri Apr 23 2010 18:00
Abortion is not genocide in the sense that the gov't is out to kill all unborn babies, the way Nazis were with Jews. (There are pro-life African-Americans and Jewish people who agree with the comparison, see blackgenocide.org.) But it's similar to genocide and slavery in that the personhood of the unborn baby is denied. Though our society is somewhat confused since sometimes the murder of a woman and her unborn baby counts as a double murder. Many have turned from pro-choice to pro-life because they become convinced that the unborn is a human being. Ultrasound has changed many minds.
Anonymous
Thu Apr 22 2010 23:37
i'm pro-life , and even i think this is over board. 1. there are better ways to get this point across. 2. gross pictures are not what i want to see at 8am. 3. scare tactics don't work on college kids- if it did, they probably wouldnt drink as much. 4. comparing it to genocide...really?
i know its freedom of speech, but still.
Anonymous
Thu Apr 22 2010 22:46
How about the fact that many tours were moving through the Green throughout the day with no way to avoid the images posted. According to multiple BHAs I have spoken to, perspective families on the tours were so bothered that immediately after passing the display they broke off from the tour with no explanation and did not return. Thanks to this display, many perspective students have most likely chosen not to come to our university. These tours are some of the most decisive factors in choosing which college to attend based on the feeling one gets from campus. Was this the message we wanted our future classmates to receive?

While this group has every right to have a say, perhaps when displaying such graphic images in such a public, unavoidable area, there should have some more warning further away from the area to allow for alternate routes to be planned and perhaps not on the day when we want to give a good impression to future students.

Anonymous
Thu Apr 22 2010 22:14
I think the best thing about this disgusting display was that it got a lot of normally complacent and maybe apathetic UD students up in arms and willing to discuss their viewpoints! Yes it was really gross but I think at the end of the day, the students got the best deal because they were able to strengthen their beliefs (and it seemed to me that most of the people hanging out there were pro-choice). I just hope that women who are pregnant and need to make a choice can feel supported and loved as they make whatever choice they do. I did not feel any of that kind of love and support from the mostly men behind the fences of the AbortionNo.org "display." Tracy M.
Anonymous
Thu Apr 22 2010 21:25
They were allowed on the Green for the same reason that any other group is allowed on the Green. Just because you don't agree with someone's thoughts doesn't meant they can't have them. I don't agree with Joe Biden but I never said he didn't have a right to say what was on his mind...so "Biden" you all! if you want to infringe on someone's first amendment right. If you disagree with what they're saying then you should use your first amendment right. However, if you are pro choice and the images were "disturbing", "repulsive", or "nauseating"...then wouldn't that suggest empathy for those fetuses that were aborted? Just putting that out there.
Anonymous
Thu Apr 22 2010 17:41
Yes it was invited by a student group: "It was invited to the university by the registered student organization Pro-Life Vanguard."
Anonymous
Thu Apr 22 2010 16:49
i'm sure all the "pro-life" students on campus were very pleased with the misleading comparisons if it means they can confuse a few more young women into giving up their right to choose
Anonymous
Thu Apr 22 2010 16:24
Genocide: the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group.

Abortion =/= genocide. Sorry.

Anonymous
Thu Apr 22 2010 16:09
agree with the above comment - are there any on-campus students/organizations who participated in this? Can any political organization can use campus space to publicize their cause with no sponsorship from within the University?
Anonymous
Thu Apr 22 2010 13:05
Student groups are allowed to reserve places on the Green. Some have had concerts etc. there. I would just say that the article makes it sound as though students were mostly upset or neutral but there are pro-life students and others on campus who agree with the display.
Anonymous
Thu Apr 22 2010 08:10
does the University have a comment? why were they allowed on the Green? some reporting here, please.






log out