Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

University community members weigh in on recent gun carry laws

Published: Tuesday, October 18, 2011

Updated: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 04:10

As federal courts prepare to examine the legality of guns in churches, the debate surrounding the possession of firearms in public settings, including college campuses, has been reexamined by some Americans.

Shootings at Delaware State University and Virginia Tech University in 2007 have spurred questions about allowing guns on college campuses.

Kurt Mueller, a regional director of Students for Concealed Carry on Campus, said the only way to stop armed criminals is to allow responsible citizens to be armed as well.

Students for Concealed Carry on Campus, a national organization advocating for concealed carry laws for college campuses, was founded shortly after the Virginia Tech shooting. Mueller said restricting the number of locations permit holders can carry their weapon presents dangerous circumstances.  

"You're creating a situation where the only people that are going to have weapons on campus are criminals," Mueller said.  

This summer, Wisconsin and Mississippi legislatures adopted policies allowing those with concealed weapon permits to carry guns onto public college campuses. On Oct. 3, Oregon overturned rules within its state university system that prohibited guns on campus.

While the state of Delaware has not passed legislation regarding weapons on college campuses, university police Chief Patrick Ogden said the school prohibits all students and faculty from carrying weapons on campus.

Ogden said he believes a greater number of people possessing guns on campus would increase the risk for students, since weapons can be stolen and make their way into the hands of criminals.

"The more guns you have, the greater the likelihood of accidental or even purposeful injuries," Ogden said.

He understands the argument for firearm possession as a means of self-defense, but believes students shouldn't feel the need to interject themselves into a conflict and risk their own safety or the safety of others.

"There might be very well-intentioned students who would never dream of hurting anyone, but they still put themselves at such a greater risk," Ogden said.  

Constitutional law professor Wayne Batchis said the only Supreme Court precedent self-defense acknowledges the right to possess a weapon in the home, while school environments are considered more sensitive and require more scrutiny.

Batchis believes the Second Amendment should not be taken as a sweeping right to possess a gun in every situation.   

"No constitutional principle, as important as it may be, is absolute," Batchis said.  

Senior Garrett Jenkins, president of the College Republicans, said guns can make people less vulnerable to assault. He supports the mission of Students for Concealed Carry on Campus and believes carrying a firearm could help students protect themselves from criminals.

"You're pretty much like a sitting duck when you're following the laws," Jenkins said.  "Criminals don't do that. They don't follow the laws."

Junior Michelle Dickerson said she would not feel safe with a policy allowing guns on campus. She believes some students could have legitimate reasons for carrying weapons, but thinks the risks of accidental injury outweigh any potential benefits.    

"If they're not trained, they could end up really hurting bystanders," Dickerson said.     

Freshman Courtney Taylor said she thinks worrying about safety on campus should not lead to dramatic protective measures.

"It shouldn't result in feeling a need to carry a gun or a knife on campus," Taylor said.  

 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

3 comments

Kolby
Thu Dec 13 2012 01:34
I am all for concealed carrying in a school zone. When a school shooting happens, there are multiple injuries and deaths because the victims are many and without defense. If just one person were carrying, they could stop the deaths of so many others. If someone wants to go through all of the class and training and fees and process of getting a concealed carry license, let them carry at school.
Anonymous
Thu Oct 20 2011 11:23
I will add this to the above comment. When I took my concealed carry course, the instructor cited an eye-opening statistic. Of the states on the eastern seaboard, Delaware has one of the highest per capita rates of violent crime (I don't recall the exact placement, but it was in the top two or three). It is certainly higher than the rates in Pennsylvania, Maryland, and New Jersey. That alone, I think, justifies the need for a means to defend oneself.

On top of that, violence knows no boundaries. Do you think that just because the university declares their property a 'no crime' zone that that's going to happen? The idea is prima facie ridiculous. According to the university's rules, I can't legally defend myself with my legally owned firearm while on campus (never mind that knives are far more deadly at close ranges and are far more accessible). Just because I'm on campus does not mean I'm automatically safe from evil. Quite the contrary, in many cases I am more vulnerable on campus because the law abiding citizens have disarmed themselves, leaving only violent criminals with arms. Look at the UK; they have some of the strictest firearms laws in the world, and violent criminals still have firearms. Ordinary citizens were completely helpless during the riots there this summer. That same dynamic could happen here.

And as the courts have ruled numerous times, the police have no duty to protect you. Let me repeat that: the police have no duty to protect you. They may try to because they are good people, but they can't (and shouldn't be expected to) be everywhere all the time. Who is going to protect you in your moment of extremity? There is only one person in this world who can protect you, and that is yourself. But if the university (or any other private entity) says you may not carry your knife or pistol, they are automatically removing most of your ability to protect yourself in your moment of utmost need (you should, of course, try to avoid trouble, but sometimes that's not possible).

To sum up: I have only myself to rely on for my safety, and the best way for me to defend myself is to carry a tool such as a knife or pistol. With the university's rules, I am not allowed to do that, and that makes me a target for someone with evil intentions. I believe the supposed risks to public safety are far outweighed by the benefits to each individual's safety by allowing individuals to carry firearms for self defense.

Anonymous
Tue Oct 18 2011 16:25
Dickerson's comment essentially nullifies itself.... Getting a permit to carry a concealed weapon does not only have a strict application process but also involves a very indepth training course eliminating anyone from passing who does not meet the training requirements.




log out