Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Reusable water bottles promoted at universities

Staff Reporter

Published: Monday, February 25, 2013

Updated: Monday, April 22, 2013 21:04

water fountain

Sara Pfefer

Water bottle refill station located in Perkins Student Center supports clean water practices for students.

 

As university administrators around the country take steps in reducing their schools’ carbon footprints, many are choosing to remove what is a convenient necessity for some students on campus—plastic water bottles. 

Most recently, the University of Vermont began to phase in a ban that would stop the sale of plastic water bottles on campus. By doing so, the university will become one of the first colleges to be free of plastic water bottles in dining halls, residence halls and on-campus convenience stores. 

Professor Richard Chapas, leader of the Sustainability Task Force, in charge of making campus more environmentally-friendly, said a similar ban throughout campus in student centers like Trabant University Center would be efficient in removing waste and providing the university with a visual demonstration of its commitment to sustainability. 

“From an environmental perspective, there will be less waste and disposable costs,” Chapas said. “From a social perspective, there will be more consciousness of the environmental impact of the products.” 

While the ban would be more environmentally sustainable, Chapas said it would have adverse effects on businesses and student drinking habits. 

In 2011, the total volume of bottled water consumption in the United States was 9.1 billion gallons, according to the Beverage Marketing Corporation. The study also found 90 universities are in the process of banning plastic bottled water.

PepsiCo and the university maintain a strong partnership, Margot Carroll, director of Hospitality Services, stated in an email message. The company, she said, has several “green initiatives,” and workers are researching new projects in recycling innovation. 

Both the university and PepsiCo include sustainability initiatives on their agendas, but Carroll said the administration will continue to offer plastic water bottles. 

“Our goal is to offer the university community choices with water stations, bottled water for sale and promoting sustainable practices by handing out refillable water bottles to every entering freshman class,” Carroll said.

Junior Samantha Burns uses both reusable and plastic water bottles, she said. Though she would support the program if it was implemented correctly, she said it might not be ideal for some students. 

It is important this change be tested first by gradually lowering the supply of plastic water bottles on campus in different locations before removing them all completely, Burns said.

“College students aren’t always planning ahead,” she said. “Not selling plastic water bottles would be really inconvenient for people our age.”

For a similar ban to be implemented there would need to be substantial support from students, the Sustainability Task Force and the city, Chapas said. 

The ban not only reduces plastic consumption and fossil fuels, but it also opens discussion on the differences between tap water and bottled water, junior Kathleen Grimes, president of Students for the Environment, said. 

“Students can realize that they don’t need to get water strictly from plastic bottles,” Grimes said. “Marketing campaigns make you believe it’s more purified than tap water but there are actually higher regulations on tap water.”

Because plastic bottles can leak chemicals into the water, Grimes said reusable water bottles that are free of a carcinogenic chemical compound that breaks down easily, Bisphenol A, are the best alternative. 

Grimes said environmentally-minded students would support a change in plastic water bottle policy and those students could encourage others to see advantages.

The university currently has one water bottle refill station that digitally monitors how much waste has been has been eliminated with each fill. The station, located in the Perkins Student Center, is similar to water stations replacing plastic water bottles in universities such as Emerson College and Vermont. 

Senior Shawn Varughese said he thinks changing the university policy on plastic water bottles would be a beneficial adjustment for students to consider. 

“It’s not something that your average student thinks about because we’re not really educated enough about the benefits of using less plastic and recycling more often,” Varughese said.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

3 comments

Chris
Wed Feb 27 2013 16:18
Hi Anonymous, this is Chris from IBWA.

While it is very clear that you personally do not like bottled water and would prefer that others subscribe to your view, providing people with misleading and incorrect information perpetuated by anti-bottled water activist groups is not helpful to an open and engaged conversation. And, while I really appreciate your passion, unfortunately you are incorrect on virtually all of your points.

Your claim that 60-70 percent of bottled water is not regulated by the FDA because it is sold in intrastate commerce is completely false. FDA's jurisdiction over bottled water products (and any other product regulated by FDA) extends not only to those products that move in interstate commerce but also to those products sold within a single state that are enclosed in packaging materials that have moved in interstate commerce.

Known as the component theory of FDA jurisdiction, courts have long held that if any component of a food product moves in interstate commerce, FDA has jurisdiction over the finished product, regardless of whether the finished product itself moves in interstate commerce. In the case of bottled water, if the plastic used in the bottles, the plastic used in the caps, the paper and ink used on the labels, any other outer packaging materials, and even the water itself comes from out of state, then FDA has jurisdiction over that product. And in today's commercial society, that will almost always be the case. Congress has recognized this fact by enacting a law that expressly presumes that all food and beverage products are sold in interstate commerce. (21 U.S.C. § 379 (a))

You also claim that the FDA has only "half a person" to oversee regulation of the bottled water industry. This myth, apart from being completely false, is also illogical. Dr. Henry Kim is in charge of the bottled water program at FDA/Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN), located in College Park, Maryland. He shares regulatory tasks with two other senior staffers at CFSAN.

CFSAN is one of six product-oriented centers, in addition to a nationwide field force, that carry out the mission of the FDA. As you know, FDA is a scientific regulatory agency responsible for the safety of the nation's domestically produced and imported foods, cosmetics, drugs, biologics, medical devices, and radiological products. The Center has over 800 employees, including highly specialized professionals such as chemists, microbiologists, toxicologists, food technologists, pathologists, molecular biologists, pharmacologists, nutritionists, epidemiologists, mathematicians, sanitarians, physicians and veterinarians.

While these individuals and their staffs oversee regulatory enactment and enforcement of the bottled water industry, the key work is done by both FDA regional offices in the United States and the states themselves. Inspections and enforcement all happen in these locations, not in College Park. All 50 states have delegation agreements with FDA, meaning that when they inspect a bottled water plant (or ANY food processing facility), they act with the full authority of the FDA.

Bottled water is a smart decision and a healthy choice when it comes to packaged beverage options. Efforts to eliminate or reduce access to bottled water only hinder attempts to encourage people to choose healthier drink options and opt for ones with have more packaging, more ingredients, and greater environmental impacts than bottled water. Consumers choose bottled water for several reasons, including its refreshing taste, reliable quality, zero calories and additives, and convenience. For people who want to eliminate or moderate calories, sugar, caffeine, artificial flavors or colors, and other ingredients from their diet, choosing water is the right choice - whether from the tap or in a bottle.

Additionally, you accuse the bottled water industry of somehow undermining public water systems. To claim that the availability of bottled water in the marketplace somehow affects the infrastructure, funding, development, and maintenance of municipal water systems makes no sense and is completely unfounded. Many bottled water products use public water system sources, which is why the bottled water industry supports a strong public water system. That water is then produced utilizing a multi-barrier approach and placed in a bottle and sealed.

Lastly, about 98.5 percent of all bottled water sold in the United States is sourced domestically. The existence of a bottled water industry in the U.S. has no impact on the availability of drinking water in, or the public service infrastructure of, any other country.

Anonymous
Tue Feb 26 2013 23:55
Chris from the International Bottle Water Association failed to mention some key details about bottled water regulation. The FDA only regulates interstate commerce and 60-70% of bottled water is sold in intrastate commerce, so 60-70% is NOT regulated by the FDA. Also, unlike tap water, bottled water companies are not required to make their test results available to the public. Approximately 9 billion gallons of bottled water are sold in the US each year, and only "half a person" at the FDA regulates the interstate portion of these sales. That is not sufficient regulation for such a huge market (although Chris misleadingly referred to this multi-billion dollar market as "tiny"). And most importantly, water is a human right. Corporations should not be selling a human right for a profit, especially when 1 in 9 people in the world do not have access to enough clean water. We need to support public water infrastructure so everyone has equal access to water.

The International Bottle Water Association is composed of bottlers, suppliers and distributors of bottled water, aka people with a huge conflict in interest. The whole bottled water industry is a ridiculous. Imagine bottling air. Through misleading marketing the industry has undermined the confidence in our public water systems and manufactured a demand for an unnecessary product.

Chris
Tue Feb 26 2013 10:02
Hi, I am from the International Bottled Water Association and need to point out a couple of factual errors in this story.

The claim that bottled water products are less regulated that tap water is simply false. Bottled water is comprehensively regulated by the United States Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) as a packaged food product and provides a consistently safe and reliable source of drinking water. By federal law, the FDA regulations governing the safety and quality of bottled water must be at least as stringent as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations that govern tap water. And, in some very important cases like coliform bacteria and E. coli, bottled water regulations are substantially more stringent.

All bottled water products - whether from groundwater or public water sources - are produced utilizing a multi-barrier approach. From source to finished product, a multi-barrier approach helps prevent possible harmful contamination to the finished product as well as storage, production, and transportation equipment.

The claim is also made that PET plastic bottled water containers are not safe. PET plastic bottles, commonly small, portable 16.9 (half-liter) and 24 ounce sizes, are safe and reliable for food contact use. PET is used in a variety of packaging for many foods, including everything from peanut butter, soft drinks, and juices to beer, wine, and spirits. PET is approved as safe for food and beverage contact by the FDA and similar regulatory agencies throughout the world, and has been for over 30 years.

Regarding bottled water's environmental footprint, all bottled water containers are 100 percent recyclable. And, when you do the math, it turns out that of all the plastics produced in the U.S., PET plastic bottled water packaging makes up only 0.92 percent; less than one percent. Moreover, plastic bottled water containers make up only one-third of one percent of the U.S. waste stream, according to the EPA.

And, according to data released in January 2013, by the National Association for PET Container Resources (NAPCOR) at 38.6 percent, recycling rates for single-serve PET plastic bottled water containers have more than doubled in the last seven years.

Despite the bottled water industry's size, the amount of water actually sold is relatively tiny, compared to tap water volumes. To put it in context, the entire U.S. bottled water market is 9 billion gallons; New York City goes through that amount of tap water in one week.

Annual bottled water production accounts for less than 0.02 percent of the total groundwater withdrawn in the United States each year. In fact, the entire U.S. beverage industry uses less than 0.03 percent. At 57 billion gallons per day, the largest user of groundwater is actually the agriculture industry. That amount equals 68 percent of total groundwater extracted in 2010.





log out