Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Politics Straight, No Chaser

Conventions Lack Policy Substance but Reaffirm Values

Published: Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Updated: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 01:09


 

Much has happened in the political world recently. The Republican National Convention took place two weeks ago in Tampa, Fla. followed by the Democratic National Convention last week in Charlotte, N.C. Many people avoid watching conventions, seeing them as tedious and superfluous events. Conventions today are more like pep-rallies or party infomercials than forums for substantive candidate and policy evaluation. The scripts are tightly-knit and no real risks are taken. At the onset of party conventions in the mid-1800s, the stakes were high and in some circumstances disputes over the party’s nominee would actually escalate into violence.  Today, not so much. Despite some drama at the RNC involving Ron Paul and his supporters walking out and Clint Eastwood’s bizarre ad-libbed address to an empty chair in which an invisible Obama sat, the conventions ran pretty much according to plan.

So, do conventions, being devoid of significant substance or surprises, still matter? To those who tune out of politics, it probably doesn’t. To others, however, convention speeches can provide enthusiasm and insight into the party and its top members. Evidence of this enthusiasm was displayed by Bill Clinton’s speech on Wednesday, which actually surpassed the ratings of the season-opening Giants Cowboys football game by more than 5 million viewers.  The speech even tied TLC’s Here Comes Honey Boo Boo, a show about a wild, tiara-clad, Red Bull-drinking six-year-old. Now that’s a feat. 

Clinton confronted some key Republican attacks head-on, especially the trending question of “Are we better off [after Obama’s first term]?” Obama has sidestepped this question for some time, but Clinton strongly and confidently provided a response. “Are we better off than we were when he [Obama] took office, with an economy in free fall, losing 750,000 jobs a month? The answer is yes!” he said.

Obama turned those figures around, creating 22 consecutive months of private-sector job growth and more than 4 million jobs since 2010, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.  

Clinton also staunchly defended other Obama policies, including the Affordable Care Act and its effect on Medicare. He called out Paul Ryan, derisively saying, “I didn’t know whether to laugh or cry” when he heard Ryan’s attack on Obama’s proposed cuts to Medicare—cuts that are identical in Ryan’s and Romney’s budget plan. 

The accuracy of Ryan’s speech caught more than just Clinton’s attention, however. Ryan’s speaking skills and his ability to capture the hearts of the audience, calling his mother his “role model,” were quite impressive and sincere. Fact-checkers found that sincerity was lacking, however, in the many false and misleading accusations in other parts of Ryan’s speech. 

One of the most notable falsehoods involved a personal anecdote about a General Motors Corp. plant in Ryan’s hometown of Janesville, Wisc. He noted that in 2008 President Obama made a speech at that very plant, promising that it would last for another hundred years. “Well, as it turned out,” Ryan expressed sullenly, “that plant didn’t last another year.” What he decided to leave out, however, is that the plant announced its closure before Obama was even elected.

Besides being a platform for call-outs and abundant rhetoric, the conventions also allowed the presidential candidates to address and, in their hope, improve perceived weaknesses or flaws.

Romney attempted to develop his “humanness” and likeability, a problem that has plagued the stiff and socially awkward businessman, with a sentimental speech from his affable wife, Anne.  According to a Gallup Poll released in August, 54 percent of Americans find Obama more likeable, compared to Romney’s 31 percent. After the convention, however, a survey from the Pew Research Center showed some possible progress, finding that 25 percent of Americans now have a more favorable view of him. 

On the other hand, Obama wanted to give off a realistic yet inspirational and united tone regarding his most vulnerable issue, the economy. He noted that he is proud of his achievements but is “far more mindful of [his] failings.” He continued, “I never said this journey would be easy, and I won’t promise that now. Yes, our path is harder—but it leads to a better place. Yes our road is longer—but we travel it together.” 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

5 comments

Anonymous
Thu Sep 13 2012 09:24
It's not a recession, it's a robbery. Banksters and their puppet politicians have all the money now. Our countries debt is over 17 trillion and unfunded liabilities over 100 trillion. Only a population of wage slaves will be able to pay this debt. We are screwed.
Anonymous
Tue Sep 11 2012 17:42
Obama and Romney are both warmongering neocons. Research: the Project for the New American Century.
Anonymous
Tue Sep 11 2012 15:46
Now that they have their respective left and right wing drones taken care of, I hope to see some presentations of real substance to help those of us in the middle who actually do some critical thinking, make our voting decision.
Anonymous
Tue Sep 11 2012 12:07
^ Word

And don't forget that the labor force participation rate is the lowest its been in like 30 years

Anonymous
Tue Sep 11 2012 12:00
Government reports issued by the Bureau of Labor Statistics underreports the severity of inflation and unemployment. Inflation is actually around 9% when using the old index utilized in the 1980s, which measures a fixed basket of consumer goods in terms of a constant standard-of-living so it is indexed to increases in overall costs of living. The current core CPI also ignores food and energy prices, where inflation has been most damaging. This was part of a government ploy in the 1990s to "reduce" the deficit and allow for smaller increases in Social Security payments to retirees, as payment increases are indexed into the system to keep up with cost-of-living increases. By underreporting true inflation, the government avoided having to increase the program payouts due to heightened cost-of-living brought on by our expansiory monetary policy at the Fed.

Unemployment is underreported as well because the statistic consistently cited by the government is only the U-3 measure, but the old U-6 measure we once employed factors in "discouraged workers"...or workers who have fallen out of the labor force since they haven't been able to find a job in 4 weeks. The U-6 is at 14.7%, and if you go a step further and include those who are long-term unemployed (without a job for over a year), it is near 22%.

As for the 96,000 jobs "added", look at where they were added. The majority were in low-paying jobs that most people would consider temporary such as retail and bartending. As for manufacturing, which the President boasts he has boosted and will continue to boost, actually lost 15,000 jobs in August.

The Americans who find Obama so likeable only do because they have been consistently lied to through dishonest reporting.

Some "recovery"...





log out