Officials propose guidelines for suspending profs
Published: Monday, March 5, 2012
Updated: Tuesday, March 6, 2012 03:03
University Faculty Senate committees outlined a proposed policy that defines procedures to suspend professors who display unsafe or disruptive behavior with pay during an open hearing on Feb. 27.
The policy, which provides guidelines for placing faculty on involuntary leave while still receiving their salary and benefits, comes after the university suspended two faculty members last year for non-disciplinary reasons, according to Faculty Senate President Jeff Jordan.
The policy is a response to the shootings at University of Alabama-Huntsville in February, where a biology professor shot six people, killing three professors and wounding three school employees.
Political science Professor Sheldon Pollack said the shooting caused university officials to realize they did not have written guidelines on how to dismiss faculty for non-disciplinary issues or unsafe behavior while protecting due process.
"The key issues [are] involuntary leave," Pollack said. "These are cases where the faculty member chooses for whatever reason not to take the leave with pay and that's the policy where we had a vacuum where there was no policy."
University general counsel Lawrence White said faculty colleagues designed the policy to allow supervisors to respond quickly. He said these situations usually happen when a department chair does not know how to handle a faculty member who is displaying dangerous or disruptive behavior. White said the policy will provide a framework on how to deal with those cases.
"This is a way that university administrators and academic professionals can address concerns that always emanate from a faculty peer or a faculty chair dealing with a difficult situation in the department," White said.
Under the proposed guidelines, emergency cases are defined as situations that pose a substantial threat to the health, safety or welfare that substantially disrupt the working environment and activities of the campus community. If that criteria is met, the vice president for finance and administration can make the decision to put someone on leave.
The policy creates a consultative panel comprised of the Faculty Senate's president and vice president, a designated representative from the American Association of University Professors, which protects professors' rights, and the deputy provost. In emergency cases, the vice president must convene with the suspended employee's dean and the panel within 24 hours to discuss the suspension.
In non-emergency situations, a dean can put a faculty member on involuntary leave after an investigation concludes that a faculty member is unable to effectively perform his or her job.
The dean will then have 15 days to meet with the panel to determine the length of the suspension, before informing the faculty member of their decision. The faculty member is allowed to appeal the decision to the senate's committee on faculty welfare and privileges.
During involuntary leave, faculty members will have restrictions on when they can visit campus and must be evaluated by an independent medical or health care professional who will report to the suspended employee's dean. If a faculty member refuses an evaluation, the leave may be extended.
The record of the suspension will not go on the faculty member's personnel file and will not negatively affect their formal employment record.
Education professor Jan Blits, who was formerly chair of Committee of Welfare and Privileges, said he is concerned about the meeting process because it denies employees due process and that in the two cases last year, the faculty members were denied due process. He also said in the meetings that the faculty would not be able to defend themselves. He said an AAUP officer is there to monitor the proceedings for compliance with the policy and is not an advocate.
He said because there is no policy to get a second opinion from other witnesses or a medical opinion before the administrator suspends a faculty member based on evidence that could be derived from hearsay. The faculty member in question would not be able to refute evidence or talk to witnesses.
"Under the most adverse circumstances—alone, unprepared, outnumbered and intimidated—the faculty member would have to make the decision rather quickly that could well adversely affect the rest of his or her career," Blits said.
He said the administration would have too much power and there wouldn't be an effective system of checks and balances. He is concerned that the policy does not require a written record of meetings, which can make an appeal difficult.
J.J. Davis, vice president for finance and administration, said university officials do not intend to infringe on anyone's rights, but in challenging situations it is important to act quickly.
"But to the extent that the extreme were to happen, catastrophe of life of oneself or others, we do feel in emergency situations the failure to act is also a problem and we've seen that play out at other institutions," Davis said. "We want balance of the safeguard for the individual and the protections and their rights and also to safeguard the community whether it be other students or members of the faculty."
History Professor John Bernstein said being removed from the lab or classroom damages a professor's career or reputation. He said the policy does not clearly state on what grounds faculty can be removed, and it can be blown out of proportion. He said the word "sole discretion" worried him.
"It seems to be lots of potential for creating harm and havoc here," Bernstein said. "There's a difference between change and progress. So this may be change but it may not be progress."
He said it would be hard for a faculty member to return after a suspension.
White said future revisions of the policy may have a tighter definition of non-emergency situations, but prefers broader criteria for identifying incidents because each case is fact-specific and may be addressed improperly under more specific guidelines.
12 comments
Anonymous
OMG. They mobbed the guy below. Well just turn your heads HARKER and OGDEN, and act like nothing happened "mobbing", and maybe the victim of the mobbing will just go away. Do nothing HARKER, and OGDEN, and that is taking part in the mobbing too. What an embarrassment!!! Called on the carpet for being "Organized Cause Stalker" retaliating agains a whistleblower. Brothers helping brothers in order to mob a whistleblower. Then have a so called "investigation" on the corrupt "the mobbing". Well if the victims has no evidence, the victim must be guilty "mobbing". And guess who investigates the mobbers "brother mobbers"? Fellow "Brothers"!!! "Brothers" helping "Brothers", and those "Brothers" will get them off...."Mobbers"!!! The judge stated, "what are security guards from the University of Delaware heading up to Lancaster Pennsylvania for anyway?" Now you know.. Formal "good faith" Complaint numbers: PHRC Case No.200800802 and EEOC Case No.17F200960329. Hurry up, and call a "freemason" an unethical journalist at the lancaster newspaper named Ad. Crable...He will post your lies on the internet 12x or more...or however many times a brother wants "mobbing". If the lies are posted enough, then the illusion has to be true "mobbing". Brother helping brothers in order to "internet blackball" "mobbing". It's nice to know the University of Delaware has so many ethical professors studying corruption "mobbing" up the street and down the steet. Law enforcement officers helping law enforcement officers "mobbing"!!! If you have enough witnesses lying for you, it must be true "mobbing". The brotherhood of social networking "mobbing". If you keep doing your ethical research University of Delaware, maybe "Time" magazine will put you in the top ten for universities studying Criminology. It sounds like a person was mobbed here by law enforcement officials based on being a whistleblower "organized Cause Stalking". But where is your evidence victim "mobbing"? Educated people know what you did "mobbing". Thanks for helping that professor in late December of 2010 judge Jerome O. Herlihy of the supreme court of Delaware in Wilmington. You pushed your honor, you back a little against the "Mobbing" bullies. You were right, "this is strange. What are security guards from the University of Delaware heading up to lancaster Pennsylvania anyway? "Felony" retaliation of a whistleblower, malicious conduct, or police miscoduct..."mobbing"! Thanks for allowing me to express my freedom of speech through the freepress free from any retaliation...
Anonymous
DEAR UD REVIEW, JUDGE JEROME O. HERLIHY, Attorney general Beau, U.S.Attorney general, and DEAN HARKER.
What about a time-line judge, and names in a social network...your honorable Jerome o. Herlihy of the superior court of Delaware? NEW EVIDENCE? or MAYBE just old EVIDENCE not given to you. If i were a judge in the Delaware superior court I wouldn't want my name associated with "felony" retaliation of a whistleblower, organized mobbing and cause stalking, and "malicious prosecution". Maybe you might want to look at this stuff Judge Jerome O. Herlihy, and talk with Dr. Robert G. Thompson at the delaware psych clinic in New Castle De. Those statements below might answer a lot of your questions, statements and your confusion at the time. They are on the courttranscript that have already been anakyzed for that late decemeber day in 2010 with that professor. The honorable Herlihy stated, "has your attorney communicated at all with you? get rid of him he isn't helping you. where did you get this guy. He is no good. You are not dangerous. I am not going to send you to jail. Jail is for dangerous people, and you certainly aren't one of them. There is nothing wrong with you. Tell me what kind of deal they gave you. Don't listen to him. tell me what he said? this is weird. What are security guards from the University of Delaware headed to Lancaster pennsylvania for anyway? this is strange. You are from york and this happened in Lancaster? this doesn't make sense." Of course it make sense when you Formal "good faith" complaints made to the Pa governors office of the human relations commission and EEOC. Why do you think the lawyers weren't communicating these things? Why do you think the University of delaware was saying the pacifest professor who never owned a gun was dangerous, and busted into his house through the window obtaining a search warrant stating he was dangerous and had weapons. They did this three weeks before the date, the governor demanded the college he work for answer the 60 counts of harassment and discrimination. Why do you think the ten month investigation of the professor started the day after the formal complaints from the governors office reached the school the professor. And ten month later with a break in. Those numbers are as followed:PHRC Case No. 200800802 and EEOC Case No.17F200960329. An illusion created in order to discredit, nullify, and silence a whistleblower. Why else would the questions and statements you stated to the professor in courtroom that late december day in 2010, not make any sense at the time. Now that you have this material. The puzzle is complete judge. No judge would want to be associated with organized cause stalkers, "felony" retaliation of a whistleblower, and "malicious" prosecution. Not one of your caliber Judge Jerome O. Herlihy. You are man honor, justice, and you are ethical. Read your transcripts, and place this information with your question and statements. Somebody better tell judge jerome O. Herlihy: He wouldn't want his name associate with any unethical behavior, and corruption. Judge Jerome O. Herlihy of the Superior Court of Delaware. 820 N. French St. #F1 11 Wilmington De. 19801-3509 phone: 302-577-7042 and 302-255-0800 Somebody was cordinating felony retaliation of whistleblower. And baiting and luring, "tricking" somebody into a crime of Fake Harasssment charges, and False Stalking charges by using a cell phone. Retaliation happens in all ways...thank you for allowing me to express my freedom of speech and freedom of the press.
What about a time-line judge, and names in a social network...your honorable Jerome o. Herlihy of the superior court of Delaware? NEW EVIDENCE? or MAYBE just old EVIDENCE not given to you. If i were a judge in the Delaware superior court I wouldn't want my name associated with "felony" retaliation of a whistleblower, organized mobbing and cause stalking, and "malicious prosecution". Maybe you might want to look at this stuff Judge Jerome O. Herlihy, and talk with Dr. Robert G. Thompson at the delaware psych clinic in New Castle De. Those statements below might answer a lot of your questions, statements and your confusion at the time. They are on the courttranscript that have already been anakyzed for that late decemeber day in 2010 with that professor. The honorable Herlihy stated, "has your attorney communicated at all with you? get rid of him he isn't helping you. where did you get this guy. He is no good. You are not dangerous. I am not going to send you to jail. Jail is for dangerous people, and you certainly aren't one of them. There is nothing wrong with you. Tell me what kind of deal they gave you. Don't listen to him. tell me what he said? this is weird. What are security guards from the University of Delaware headed to Lancaster pennsylvania for anyway? this is strange. You are from york and this happened in Lancaster? this doesn't make sense." Of course it make sense when you Formal "good faith" complaints made to the Pa governors office of the human relations commission and EEOC. Why do you think the lawyers weren't communicating these things? Why do you think the University of delaware was saying the pacifest professor who never owned a gun was dangerous, and busted into his house through the window obtaining a search warrant stating he was dangerous and had weapons. They did this three weeks before the date, the governor demanded the college he work for answer the 60 counts of harassment and discrimination. Why do you think the ten month investigation of the professor started the day after the formal complaints from the governors office reached the school the professor. And ten month later with a break in. Those numbers are as followed:PHRC Case No. 200800802 and EEOC Case No.17F200960329. An illusion created in order to discredit, nullify, and silence a whistleblower. Why else would the questions and statements you stated to the professor in courtroom that late december day in 2010, not make any sense at the time. Now that you have this material. The puzzle is complete judge. No judge would want to be associated with organized cause stalkers, "felony" retaliation of a whistleblower, and "malicious" prosecution. Not one of your caliber Judge Jerome O. Herlihy. You are man honor, justice, and you are ethical. Read your transcripts, and place this information with your question and statements. Somebody better tell judge jerome O. Herlihy: He wouldn't want his name associate with any unethical behavior, and corruption. Judge Jerome O. Herlihy of the Superior Court of Delaware. 820 N. French St. #F1 11 Wilmington De. 19801-3509 phone: 302-577-7042 and 302-255-0800 Somebody was cordinating felony retaliation of whistleblower. And baiting and luring, "tricking" somebody into a crime of Fake Harasssment charges, and False Stalking charges by using a cell phone. Retaliation happens in all ways...thank you for allowing me to express my freedom of speech and freedom of the press.
Anonymous
OMG. That's B.S. below. No wonder the public defender wasn't communicated with the judge or his client. Thats "felony" retaliation of whistleblower and "malicious prosecution". Did you read that stuff below? That judge had to know there was something wrong when he asked "did your attorney communicate with you at all? Get rid of him. he is no good. where did you get this guy? he isn't helping you. Why are U.D.security guards headed way up to Lancaster pa anyway?" I will be a monkey uncle. OMG that's retaliation of whistleblower. They were pull some funny business. They tried to pull the wool over that judges eyes...lol The judge figured out something funny was going on....OMG. That's scandalous, and corrupt...
Anonymous
Talk about government corruption. They did a number on that guy below. That did some kind of corporated mobbing retaliation stuff on that dude. That public defender below misrepresented that guy. He kept information away from the judge that would help him. that's terrible!!! The judge is stating something not right. Well now the judge can make it right if somebody tells him... That's uncalled for Dean harker...
Anonymous
That no sense below there what they did to that guy. they were stalking him. even if just part of it all down there was true, it's sick. Somebody knew what was going on with that guy. Judge jerome O. Herlihy had to have some sense of what was going on, or else he wouldn't have stated those things. They were harassing him over a period of two years. Its groups stalking by security. It is retaliation. I would contact Judge Jerome O. Herlihy, and the Attorney general of delaware. Judge jerome O. Herlihy address is: Judge of the superior court of Delaware 820 N. French St # F1 11 Wilmington DE 19801-3509 phone number; 302-577-7042 and 302-255-0800There something crazy going on below. There quotes, times, names, specific cases, numbers of complaints to governor. this is no sense. The students, adminstration, and everybody who reads this stuff should be sick to their stomach. They set the guy. They were harassing him, stalking him, and retaliating against him for turning them in the first place. How sick is that. they mob you, you turn to the governor and then they mob you and set you up. If that isn't corruption, what is??? If the University of Delaware security dept can do those things, and get away with it.. how can anybody ever trust the security at U.D. again? They can't be trusted...
Anonymous
Gee. holly smokes, I read that stuff below...Boy somebody in U.D. security screwed the pooch on this one. I have never heard of security guards doing the things the ones below are said to be doing. It doesn't make sense why security guards are heading to other states...only until you throw in the complaints to the Pa governors office does the light bulb go off. Looks like they were setting their U.D. security reports "police reports" up to support the Attorney for that community college in lancaster that the professor filed complaints against. That's why there are so many lies on the police reports, the U.D. security was supporting Harrisburg Area Community College in Lancaster. This is typical in whistleblower complaints according to the studies and research on retaliation of whistleblowers. Chances are the police reports were pre-dated, posted-dated, and largely written after the break in of the professor's house. They gathered information on the professor when the U.D.security broke in, and then the attorney for the college, and the U.D.security collaborated in corruption, or as it is said below "Felony" retaliation of a whistleblower. Certainly, there is some sort of corruption going on here or communication between the college at fault in Lancaster, and the U.D. security. Either way, it is inappropriate. This information should be taken seriously and investigated by the police misconduct unit of the attorney general office. I cerain they will find some type of misconduct. And I am certain the information below should be reviewed by the judge, and the U.S. attorney General. Many of question the judge had in court will be answered for him, if he review the courtroom transcripts. There is just too much information, and even if only a bare minium of it were true, there still remains manny unethical behaviors being committed by both the lawyers, and the U.D.security.
Anonymous
DEAR UD REVIEW, JUDGE JEROME O. HERLIHY, and ATTORNEY GENERAL "Beau", and U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL HONORABLE ERIC HOLDER,Don't rock the boat too much. It might expose corruption. This stuff below was all suppose to be kept a secret. Isn't that right Attorney Natalie Woolshin esq of Wilmington? They never got the professor's side of the story, in Natalie Woolshin's words, "Oh, everybody already gotten the U.D. security's side of the story. Oh, There is another side of the story to all this. And they haven't gotten that story yet. Those security guards at U.D.are known for arresting kids for under age drinking, and silly stuff like that. This is the biggest things that ever happened in U.D.security history." Well, let me tell you something UD REVIEW, it all honesty...The case against the professor up in Lancaster Pennsylvania is even more bizarre then sounds. As the FBI, and Judge Jerome O. Herlihy stated, "What are security guards from U.D. headed up to Lancaster Pennsylvania for anyway? This weird." Well how about formal "good faith" complaint numbers to the Pennsylvania Governor's office of the Human Relations Commission? Those complaint numbers are as followed: PHRC Case No.200800802 and EEOC Case No.17F200960329. The Pa state Trooper, who called the professor three times after he had watched the University of Delaware security break in through the window of the professor house way up on Woods Ave in Lancaster Pennsylvania stated, "I have never seen an investigation like this. This certainly is not Pa state police protocol, nor none that I have ever seen. We just call people. We just don't break into people's house. We communicate with people. we just don't come out and get them. This is weird. They walked right across the street during a mid summer day, and knew who exactly was home on the street. This strange, I don't get it. You don't have any guns. 90% of the stuff they took had nothing to do with any charges. They called the Lancaster paper, and gave me that information. This doesn't make any sense." Well, You didn't know there was formal "good faith" complaint to the governors office of the PHRC, did you trooper? 90% of the stuff they took I assume went to the attorney for Harrisburg Area Community College in Lancaster, who had to answer, the sixty counts of Harassment and discrimination the governor demand the professor employer answer in three weeks. The Pa governors office set a date, they had of the school push the dates back, and back and not answering the 60 counts of harassment and discrimination. Three weeks before, the house of professors was broken into. On the grounds the pacifest professor, who never owned a gun in his life was stated to be "dangerous, and have weapons" An old trick to get a search warrant. A specific trick the National Whistleblower associated state, organized cause stalkers are using to gain entry into whistleblowers houses. The judge Herlihy stated, " you are not dangerous. I am certainly not going to put in jail, jail is for dangerous people and you are certainly not one of them. Tell me what kind of deal they gave you. Get rid of him. He is no good. Where did you get this guy? He isn't helping you. Has your attorney even communicated with you at all?" No he didn't Judge Herlihy. The Public defender and the prosecutor never told you about the whistleblower complaints to the Pa governor, did they? They never communicated those police reports from U.D. that were riddled with lies, did they judge? They did not communicate the grounds of the search warrant, nor did they communicate Dr. Robert G. Thompson forensic psychologist's two evaluations to you. In fact judge, You were 1000% right, They did not communicate with the professor nor you Judge Herlihy about any special circumstances. I am sure he stated the professor/ex-U.S.soldier/ex-child counselor wasn't a liar. And certainly the professor just didn't turn 35 and schzophrenic....in fact they didn't communicate at all to niether the professor nor judge Herlihy. Isn't that was the prosecution and the security were communicating with the Forensic psychologist and suggesting? I know, he was trustworthy, and communicated what you had done to others. Grounds for dissmisal by the Delaware BAR association, and "malicious prosecution". Nobody gave you a time-line judge Jerome O. Herlihy...Just piece-meal stuff, and not communicating...typical malicious prosecution of a whistleblower. Thank you for allowing me to express my freedom of speech through the freedom of the press.
Anonymous
OMG Danielle,
Did you kids read that below. I always though the U.D.security guards were kind shady...They do lie. Having a buddy call in to the U.D. security dept, and knowingly, and intentionally taking his lies, and putting his statements on official documents. I guess OGDEN and HARKER will have to do some damage control and lie their way out of this mess. I guess they got rid of the freemason/ex-fbi guy, who signed the bottom of the U.D.police reports, just before all this hit the fan. I wouldn't listen to them now, they already violated the trust of the newspapers, and the journalists by lying the first time to both U.D.newspapers. Then they contacted an unethical journalist at the lancaster paper, who is freemasons, and assiciated with the corrupt college. I would talk to the judge, and get courtroom transcripts, the police reports, the formal complaints to the Pa governor, talk to the forensic psychologist, and most of all, sit down with the professor, and ex-soldier. He will not lie to you. This story could be in the New York Times or one of bigger papers. This big time scandal at a small time college. What are security guards headed to lancaster pa for anyway? Something wrong here, a little scratching by a good young journalist, and you will big time "felony" retaliation of a whistleblower, and malicious prosecution.
Did you kids read that below. I always though the U.D.security guards were kind shady...They do lie. Having a buddy call in to the U.D. security dept, and knowingly, and intentionally taking his lies, and putting his statements on official documents. I guess OGDEN and HARKER will have to do some damage control and lie their way out of this mess. I guess they got rid of the freemason/ex-fbi guy, who signed the bottom of the U.D.police reports, just before all this hit the fan. I wouldn't listen to them now, they already violated the trust of the newspapers, and the journalists by lying the first time to both U.D.newspapers. Then they contacted an unethical journalist at the lancaster paper, who is freemasons, and assiciated with the corrupt college. I would talk to the judge, and get courtroom transcripts, the police reports, the formal complaints to the Pa governor, talk to the forensic psychologist, and most of all, sit down with the professor, and ex-soldier. He will not lie to you. This story could be in the New York Times or one of bigger papers. This big time scandal at a small time college. What are security guards headed to lancaster pa for anyway? Something wrong here, a little scratching by a good young journalist, and you will big time "felony" retaliation of a whistleblower, and malicious prosecution.
Anonymous
DEAR UDREVIEW, JUDGE JEROME O. HERLIHY, ATTORNEY GENERAL BEAU, and DEAN HARKER,It pretty clear to me what the guy is saying below.Maybe we should suspend those two University Security guards who participating in "felony" retaliation of a whistleblower. Not just any whistleblower, but a professor who lodge a formal "good faith" complaint with the Pennsylvania Governors Office of the Human Relations Commission, and the EEOC. The formal "good faith" complaint was against Harrisburg Area Community College in Lancaster Pennsylvania. The formal "good faith" complaint number sixty counts of harassment and discrimination. The college was apparently harassing, discriminating, and running off professors. There were three professors in three years harassed, discriminated, or run off. If you count the homosexual at Harrisburg Area Community College in Lancaster that was discriminated against and ran off, you will have four unlawful act by the community college in three years. The professor, who filed the formal "good faith" complaints appeared before Judge Jerome O. Herlihy in late December of 2010. The judge stated, "did you attorney even communicate with you at all? he is no good. Where did you get him? He isn't helping you. Get rid him. You are not dangerous. There is nothing wrong with you. What is he whispering to you. tell me. What kind of deal did they give you? tell me. This is weird. What are security guards from the University of Delaware headed to Lancaster Pennsylvania for anyway? you are from york, and this happened in Lancaster? this is doesn't make sense." Judge Jerome O. Herlihy, after you read the University of Delaware police report riddled with lies, the false testimony, and statements by a "trustworthy" witness on the U.D. police reports who lied every time, after read the evaluation completed by forensic psychologist Dr. Robert G. Thompson at the New Castle DE psych clinic, read the time line, and look at the following Whistleblower complaints: PHRC Case No.200800802 and EEOC Case No. 17F200960329. After exam these items, you will know what it is: "felony" retaliation of a whistleblower, malicious prosecution, organized cause stalking, electromic harassment by police baiting and luring indviduals, electronic stalking by police baiting and luring individuals, and police misconduct. It sounds to me like classic "felony" retaliation of a whistleblower where University of Delaware security guards are engaging in terror stalking, and organized cause stalking. The ten month investigation gives it away. The investigation started a day after the formal compliant reached the school, and ended ten months later, three week before the date the governor stated he wanted answers to the 60 counts of harassment and discrimination. So they busted into the professor house obtaining a search warrant by deception saying the professor was dangerous and had weapons. The professor was a pacifest and never owned a gun in his life. That is classic whistleblower retaliation. By studying and research the people such as the security guards from the University of Delaware who took part in this corrupt and retalitory behavior can never be trusted again. Research has concluded that those who engage in this type of activity will most likely do more corrupt things, possibly next to a student, or a faculty member, or maybe somebody else in the community. They created a illusion a crime was committed through trickery in order to discredit, nullify, and silence a whistleblower. They manufacture a crime in order to retaliate against the professor. This is classic corruption being brought to you right over your little UDREVIEW. apparently those security guards already shot off their months and lied the day after they engaged in this behavior. They lied to both the kids who wrote about the incident at both the university of delaware papers. So it too late to believe them. They also had gotten a freemason named ad crable from the lancaster newspaper to put the two security guards lies on the internet 12x. He is an unethical freemason newspaper writer. Thank you for allowing me to express my freedom of speech through the freepress. Get this material to Judge jerome O. Herlihy. Those security guards at U.D. can not be trusted any more. thank you,
Anonymous
DEAR UD REVIEW, DEAN HARKER, JUDGE JEROME O. HERLIHY, and ATTORNEY GENERAL,I think the thing about the comments below in regards to absolute corruption is that those security guards at U.D. already shot off their mouths to an unethical freemason at the Lancaster paper named Ad Crable. They already spread their illusion of trickery in order to discredit, nullify, and silence a whistleblower. They are had the public defender and the prosecutor engage in "malicious prosecution" in front of Judge Jerome O. Herlihy in late December of 2010. They already manufactured a crime, and inappropriately investigated a man for ten months starting the day after the formal complaint and ending ten months later, and just days before the Pa Governor order the professor college to answer the sixty counts of harassment and discrimination. They already lied about that professor up in Lancaster Pennsylvania. They already shot off their mouth and lied to the kids, who write at the University of Delaware Newspapers. They already lied about what they had done, and already lied on their police reports. As a matter of a fact now, the University of Delaware's security can not be trusted, they are unethical, and they liars. It would be my advice to never believe them again, and fire them immediately. It is too to retract the lies. It is too late to say it is a mistake. For more then ten months those U.D. security guards knew exactly what they were egaging in, and they methodically went about it, and knowingly, intentionally, and blantly lied. The police misconduct was "diliberate", "intentional", and they knowingly engaged in "felony" retaliation of a whistleblower. Not any whistleblower, but one who was the third professor to be harassed/discriminated against in less than three years at Harrisburg Area Community College in Lancaster. And if you count the homosexual who was discriminated against and ran off the professor was the fourth person in three years to be victimized at Harrisburg Area Community College in Lancaster. As the FBI, Judge Jerome O. Herlihy, and the Pa State trooper stated, "this is weird. What are security guards from the University of Delaware headed up to lancaster Pennsylvania for anyway? 90% of what they took when they busted through you window had nothing to do with any charges. We just communicate with people. We just don't come out and bust through their windows. Did your attorney communicate with you at all?" It's fixed casino. An illusion through trickery by a group of organized cause stalkers to discredit a whistleblower, nullify a whistleblower, and silence a whistleblower. I think now your committes or dean or who ever is charge at the University of Delaware should move to get rid of those corrupt liars and prosecute them. They harass students for under age drinking, they arrest people for stealing books, or pretty things of that nature...in the 200 year history of U.D. security, no security guards has ever engaged in something so corrupt, and unlawful by heading to another state in order to retaliate against a whistleblower. It is pathetic, disturbing, and dispectable...they can not be trusted. That is exactly what they did...Thank you for allowing me to express my freedom of the truth, and my freedom of speech through the freepress.
Anonymous
DEAR UD REVIEW, DEAN HARKER, JUDGE JEROME O. HERLIHY of the Delaware Superior Court in Wilmington, and Attorney General Beau,
Of course absolute power corrupts, just look at those two security guards at the University of Delaware that lied on their police reports, and retaliated against that professor for filing Formal "good faith" complaints with the Pa governors office of the Human Relations Commission and EEOC way up in Lancaster pennsylvania. Something wrong when two U.D.security guards can "intetionally" lie, and investigate whistleblower in another state for ten months, electonically harass him, electronically stalk him, agitate him, provoke him, and then bust in through his window ten months after, three weeks before the Pa governor orders his employer to answer the 60 counts of harassment, and discrimination. Something wrong with that picture when U.D. security guards can obtain a search warrant by saying a pacifest professor, who has never owned a gun is dangerous and has weapons. One once of authority can give you the right to blantly lie, and have your buddy "a trustworthy" witness call in to those two U.D.security guards, and he can lie about anything he wants too, and his statements are placed on the security guards police reports. Something is extremely wrong when you can hand that garbage off, and those lies those U.D. police reports riddled with lies to a prosecutor, and a public defender, and they can blantly engage in "malicious prosecution" of a whistlebower. Those Formal "good faith" complaint are as followed:PHRC Case No.200800802 and EEOC Case No.17F200960329. He appeared in front of you Judge Jerome O. Herlihy on a late December day, and you stated, "Has this attorney communicated with you at all? where did you get this attorney? He is no good. He is not helping you. Get rid of him. Don't listen to him. What kind of deal did these two give you? tell me. what is he whispering? tell me. You are not dangerous. I am not going to put you in jail, jail is for dangerous people and you certainly are not one of them. This is weird. What are security guards from the Univrsity of Delaware heading up to Lancaster Pennsylvania for anyway? you are from york, and not from lancaster. This is strange. Somthing doesn't make sense here?" Well Judge jerome O. Herlihy you were right, neither was the public defender communicating with you about a whistleblower complaint, but the public defender wasn't communicating with his client at all. It is weird Judge Jerome O. Herlihy, it even stranger, that these two did not give you then extensive reports Forensic psychologist Dr. Robert G. Thompson had constructed for you at the Delaware psych clinic in New Castle. What is even more bizarre and "intentional" is the fact that neither the prosecution, nor the public defender had given to you, nor mentioned the U.D. police reports that were riddled with lies, and false testimony by a "trustworthy" witness, who lied every single time to those two security guards at U.D. How bizarre is it when security guards can drive all the way up to Lancaster during the morning of a hot August day, and know there is nobody home on his Woods ave home, and bust in through the window, and take college books, pile ex-girlfriends gifts of polo shirts up on the bed, and three of his U.S. army medals can vanish underneith his beret on the top of the dresser from his three honorable discharges. And then contact a freemason journalist at the lancaster newspaper named Ad Crable, and tell this unethical freemason the lies that are on the U.D. security reports. And this unethical freemason ad crable can then place those lies on the internet 12x. And how a Pa State Cop can call three times and flat out say, "something weird here. 90% of the stuff they took has nothing to do with any charges. We just communicate. we don't come out and just bust in people houses. we call them." That is because 90% of that stuff went to Harrisburg Area Community College's attorney in order to answer the sixty allegation of harassment and discrimination. "felony" retaliation of a whistleblower. Absolute corruption! How bizarre is it that a professor can earn three honorable discharges, and come forward to the Pa governor and tell the truth, and these security guard at U.D. and everybody else can attempt to have the professor diagnosed with schzophernia or some other bizarre disorder. This is all classic material from the research on how organized cause stalkers retaliate against whistleblowers. It is text book retaliation, and corruption...it is "malicious prosecution", "felony" retaliation of a whistleblower, and police misconduct. Thank you for allowing me to express my freedom of the truth, and freedom of speech through the freepress.
Of course absolute power corrupts, just look at those two security guards at the University of Delaware that lied on their police reports, and retaliated against that professor for filing Formal "good faith" complaints with the Pa governors office of the Human Relations Commission and EEOC way up in Lancaster pennsylvania. Something wrong when two U.D.security guards can "intetionally" lie, and investigate whistleblower in another state for ten months, electonically harass him, electronically stalk him, agitate him, provoke him, and then bust in through his window ten months after, three weeks before the Pa governor orders his employer to answer the 60 counts of harassment, and discrimination. Something wrong with that picture when U.D. security guards can obtain a search warrant by saying a pacifest professor, who has never owned a gun is dangerous and has weapons. One once of authority can give you the right to blantly lie, and have your buddy "a trustworthy" witness call in to those two U.D.security guards, and he can lie about anything he wants too, and his statements are placed on the security guards police reports. Something is extremely wrong when you can hand that garbage off, and those lies those U.D. police reports riddled with lies to a prosecutor, and a public defender, and they can blantly engage in "malicious prosecution" of a whistlebower. Those Formal "good faith" complaint are as followed:PHRC Case No.200800802 and EEOC Case No.17F200960329. He appeared in front of you Judge Jerome O. Herlihy on a late December day, and you stated, "Has this attorney communicated with you at all? where did you get this attorney? He is no good. He is not helping you. Get rid of him. Don't listen to him. What kind of deal did these two give you? tell me. what is he whispering? tell me. You are not dangerous. I am not going to put you in jail, jail is for dangerous people and you certainly are not one of them. This is weird. What are security guards from the Univrsity of Delaware heading up to Lancaster Pennsylvania for anyway? you are from york, and not from lancaster. This is strange. Somthing doesn't make sense here?" Well Judge jerome O. Herlihy you were right, neither was the public defender communicating with you about a whistleblower complaint, but the public defender wasn't communicating with his client at all. It is weird Judge Jerome O. Herlihy, it even stranger, that these two did not give you then extensive reports Forensic psychologist Dr. Robert G. Thompson had constructed for you at the Delaware psych clinic in New Castle. What is even more bizarre and "intentional" is the fact that neither the prosecution, nor the public defender had given to you, nor mentioned the U.D. police reports that were riddled with lies, and false testimony by a "trustworthy" witness, who lied every single time to those two security guards at U.D. How bizarre is it when security guards can drive all the way up to Lancaster during the morning of a hot August day, and know there is nobody home on his Woods ave home, and bust in through the window, and take college books, pile ex-girlfriends gifts of polo shirts up on the bed, and three of his U.S. army medals can vanish underneith his beret on the top of the dresser from his three honorable discharges. And then contact a freemason journalist at the lancaster newspaper named Ad Crable, and tell this unethical freemason the lies that are on the U.D. security reports. And this unethical freemason ad crable can then place those lies on the internet 12x. And how a Pa State Cop can call three times and flat out say, "something weird here. 90% of the stuff they took has nothing to do with any charges. We just communicate. we don't come out and just bust in people houses. we call them." That is because 90% of that stuff went to Harrisburg Area Community College's attorney in order to answer the sixty allegation of harassment and discrimination. "felony" retaliation of a whistleblower. Absolute corruption! How bizarre is it that a professor can earn three honorable discharges, and come forward to the Pa governor and tell the truth, and these security guard at U.D. and everybody else can attempt to have the professor diagnosed with schzophernia or some other bizarre disorder. This is all classic material from the research on how organized cause stalkers retaliate against whistleblowers. It is text book retaliation, and corruption...it is "malicious prosecution", "felony" retaliation of a whistleblower, and police misconduct. Thank you for allowing me to express my freedom of the truth, and freedom of speech through the freepress.
Anonymous
Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely... Anyone who asks for power and promises never to use it should never be given that power...
is a member of the 
