Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Abortion protest to return to The Green

Published: Monday, May 2, 2011

Updated: Tuesday, May 3, 2011 04:05

One year after their anti-abortion protest sparked controversy on campus, the registered student organization Pro-Life Vanguard will return to The Green Thursday and Friday with a display featuring graphic imagery of aborted fetuses, Holocaust victims and lynching.

The Genocide Awareness Project, an initiative of the Center for Bioethical Reform, an anti-abortion group, makes comparisons between genocide and abortion, in what protest organizers call an effort to combat the dehumanization of unborn fetuses.

"We want people to understand that the preborn child is in fact a human being that has value, and that abortion is an act of violence," said Gina Paladinetti, president of Pro-Life Vanguard.

Last year, hundreds of university community members gathered around the display, some protesting its comparison to genocide, and debated free speech on campus. Other less-serious onlookers held up joke signs, scrawled with statements like "Pro-Viking" and "Protesting is for losers!"

For this year's event, students have already begun organizing several serious counter-protests.

Sophomore Becky Burgess, a member of the feminist RSO V-Day, is organizing one such demonstration.

She said she felt disrespected and angered by the display last year, and this response triggered her desire to organize a counter protest.

"I feel like they were using the struggles of other marginalized groups [like African-Americans and Holocaust victims] and using these people and their stories as props," Burgess said.

Though students reacted strongly to the display's comparison between abortion and genocide, Paladinetti said the group does not regard the two acts as equal. Rather, she said there are ways to compare the forms of genocide with abortion.

"Most people who talk about abortion have never seen what it actually is or what it does to the unborn child," Paladinetti said.

Paladinetti, who requested to book event space on The Green in March, said unborn fetuses are often dehumanized in the same way Jews were during the Holocaust.  

Burgess said even though Pro-Life Vanguard members might not equate abortion with genocide, the group they are bringing to campus does.

"I think everyone that was there last year would say that there was really no budge room in what they were saying," Burgess said. "They weren't saying, ‘Have you ever thought about this?' They were saying abortion is a form of genocide."

Senior Sarah Foster, who also plans to participate in the counter protest, said the group has decided to have a sit in-type demonstration, displaying signs and passing out information about sex and abortion to students, instead of verbally confronting Pro-Life Vanguard.

Foster, a self-proclaimed feminist, said she was personally offended by last year's display.

"I think that it's important to have free speech, and people can say what they want, but when it causes harm to people, I think it should be regulated," Foster said.

Michael Gilbert, vice president of Student Life, said all students and RSOs are permitted to book space on university property to hold events, though the university does follow specific guidelines in determining the feasibility of some events.  

Individuals or groups wishing to hold events on campus must fill out comprehensive paperwork, describing their event, the desired location and timeframe, he said.

Before approving a space request, officials consider whether an event would affect the health and safety of the university community or interfere with the normal business of the university, like classes and office activity, Gilbert said.

Per university policy, groups requesting space do not have to explicitly show or demonstrate to university officials what their event will entail. Movies shown on The Green or music played by groups on university property do not have to be pre-approved, and this same principle applies to the Genocide Awareness Project's posters.

For the second year, officials determined that Pro-Life Vanguard's request would not disrupt university life, Gilbert said.

Paladinetti said she provided the Genocide Awareness Project's website, whose homepage contains the display's graphic imagery, on her space request form. She said this year's display will be identical to last year's, though the size of the display may be slightly smaller.

To address the concern that the posters were unavoidable last year, officials have moved the display's location closer toward the center of the lawn, away from the sidewalks and steps of Gore Hall.

After last year's display, many university community members questioned why school officials permitted the Genocide Awareness Project to demonstrate on campus.

However, outside groups and initiatives are permitted on campus if sponsored by an RSO. Gilbert said university officials strive to be unbiased when determining which groups hold events on university grounds.

"The point that we make […] and what we would want other people to understand is that when student organizations ask for space on campus to educate or express a viewpoint, we are content neutral," Gilbert said. "That's what we endeavor to provide—because we want there to be an environment and a climate on campus where speech is allowed and where there's an opportunity for people to engage, to express their own viewpoints, but also to engage others in debate and discussion."

Paladinetti said her group welcomes student opinion and reaction to the display.

"I already know that people are going to be protesting, and that doesn't bother us at all," Paladinetti said. "They're allowed to express their free speech rights, just like we are."

 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

26 comments

Rich
Mon May 9 2011 18:07
As I said I would have to hear from a cross-section of people to see if they feel the display equates women who have had abortions with Nazis, it doesn't sound to me that you are a disinterested bystander. Last year PLV brought in a speaker from Silent No More Awareness to talk about post-abortion women partly in response to people who wanted a different kind of pro-life program. Would you have supported that? I have a feeling if you are a staunch abortion rights supported that any kind of pro-life program you would have problems with. (Maybe you were one of the ones posting critical comments of that program too...). Part of it is the different ways we looks at the issue. If you believe the woman can do whatever she wants to the life inside her and it's not human, then obviously you're going to look at it very differently from those who think the life inside is a human being.
Anonymous
Fri May 6 2011 20:22
You want to downplay the Nazi aspect, yet it is central to your argument. You cannot have it both ways. Either it is important, and you think these people really are akin to Nazis, or it is unimportant, which throws the entire purpose and execution of your display into question. You decide. You went and volunteered to stand with them, so yes, you are speaking as their representative.

If I mutter under my breath that you are a Nazi, I still have called you a Nazi. It does not matter than you did not clearly hear or understand me.

Rich
Fri May 6 2011 19:05
I'll just add that I cannot speak for those who made the display but on their website (which I can't link to here abortionno "dot" org) it says: (FAQ #16) Don���t you care about women who have had abortions? Don���t you think your pictures cause them pain? Our goal is not to cause post-abortal women pain, but to save human lives. Women who have already aborted are at greater risk for future abortions. Approximately 45% of women who seek abortions have already had a previous abortion. We want to spare them and their children more suffering." So that's their view. I know the PLV students' view mirrors that.
Rich
Fri May 6 2011 18:11
If there is a scientific poll conducted of a broad spectrum of people asking them if they felt the display was equating women who had abortions with Nazis and a large majority said yes, then I would think maybe you were right on that point. But I don't believe everyone gets that from it. There are women on our side who have had abortions, you can ask them if they feel that pro-lifers treat them like Eichmann. But most of us are Christians who see everyone a sinner to one degree or another so there's no room for self-righteousness. Even the worst Nazi could be forgiven by God if he truly humbled himself and asked for it . So it's not about condemning women, it's about exposing what abortion is. As far as Planned Parenthood, Abby Johnson, former Planned Parenthood Clinic director, talks frankly about her culpability in the deaths of children on her blog. But she has also known the forgiveness of God.
Anonymous
Fri May 6 2011 17:47
Give me a break; treat your audience with something other than contempt for their intelligence. You know very well that a broad spectrum of dissent and discourse exists between silence and the extreme, misogynist tactics in which your group engages. That is a false dichotomy and you know it.

What your group does is "play the Nazi card." Sure, you can point to your placards and try to say that the claim is not explicit, but you know very well that your anything-but-subtle allusions to the Holocaust and genocide are a dog whistle intended to shame viewers into equating women facing difficult decisions with the ultimate yardstick of evil in Western culture. Maybe you don't say outright that Planned Parenthood is the new Sturmabteilung, but you surely insinuate it in quite direct fashion, and you know exactly what you are doing. Maybe you don't explicitly equate women who choose to exercise control over their bodies in a lawful manner (nice try with Gosnell - I saw what you did there), but when you introduce images of swastikas and concentration camp victims into the debate, you are not just making a rhetorical point as you seem to think, you are urging your audience to view these women as they would Eichmann or Himmler or Hitler. That is propaganda, it is contemptible, it is a waste of university resources, and it is a waste of what might otherwise have been a "teachable moment," to borrow the phrase.

Rich
Fri May 6 2011 17:13
I wasn't agreeing the display is intellectually lazy. Obviously displays and protests are different things from scholarly articles, academic debates etc. There have been academic abortion debates, lectures on the pro-life side on campus; there have also been pro-abortion rights protests (like pro-choice people w/ coat hanger signs, is that intellectual?) Your major offense seems to be thinking the display equating women who have had abortions with Nazis.
The point is the systematic destruction of human life, that's the comparison. I do believe there are some abortionists such as the infamous Dr. Gosnell just indicted on murder charges in Pa. who are on the level of ranking Nazis. But the display nowhere says there is a one-to-one correspondence between all aspects of everyone involved with abortion and Nazism. The point is to have widespread abortion society has embraced the view that unborn are less than human. Only God knows the heart of each woman who has chosen abortion, but there are many women who do not know what they're getting into, I'm not saying all but many, and others who don't think it's right but feel trapped. PLV has had in women from Silent No More to talk about post-abortive women. I realize it's hard to raise the issue but the other option is silence for fear of offense and I feel that not speaking out would be wrong.
Anonymous
Fri May 6 2011 15:23
It's a little hard to ignore something like that planted in the middle of the Green. But then, that probably is just my ego talking and I should get over myself.
Anonymous
Fri May 6 2011 15:01
"You just happen to be my special project today."

Seems to me like you just like to find something to disagree with and run with it. The correlation between women, Nazis, and racism is to draw attention to the project. Once they have your attention then they go ahead with their viewpoint. I���m still trying to figure out what YOUR viewpoint is. If you���re concern is ���dumb speech��� then ignore it. If your concern is that you disagree with their view then debate them. Get over yourself.

Anonymous
Fri May 6 2011 14:47
Also, stop trying to make this into a free speech issue. It isn't. I'm not trying to get your little endeavor banned, I'm trying to expose it for the inane, shallow, and intellectually impoverished exercise in propaganda that it is.
Anonymous
Fri May 6 2011 14:42
No, see, the high ground isn't yours when you start off with comparisons between women and Nazis. The bikinis - sure, it's puerile, but you don't get to say it. That's not your criticism to make when you throw around irresponsible, hyperbolic hand grenades like equating abortion with genocide.

And yes, there are a lot of intellectually lazy students and student groups on campus. You just happen to be my special project today. Claiming that somehow your laziness is acceptable because it is on par with everybody else's laziness is quite pathetic.

If UD students have something unique to contribute to this debate, let's have it. This is not unique, and it is not constructive. This community deserves better, and the students are capable of delivering better.

Rich
Fri May 6 2011 14:29
If you have a problem with "dumb speech" then you would have to ban a lot of what goes on at UD protests and campus life. Earlier today the counter-protesters were out there dancing around in bikinis offering free condoms, is that the intellectual level of discourse you advocate? As far as saying it's lazy to invite outside campus groups to come, that happens all the time on campus both with the university administration and student groups, Pro-Life Vanguard isn't doing anything that is standard practice on campus. The comparison w/ genocide is the end result, not all people involved.
Anonymous
Fri May 6 2011 10:58
"One of the signs specifically says they don't believe women who have had abortions are like Nazis."

Who cares? When virtually every other element of the display makes that connection - explicitly or implicitly - the end result is the same, and the disclaimer means nothing. They most certainly do believe that, even if they are too cowardly to admit it.

Anonymous
Fri May 6 2011 10:53
Equating people whom you oppose and condemn with Nazis, Klansmen, and other murderers is intellectually lazy and hyper-emotional, and you know it full well; don't add being disingenuous to your sins. All your group did was arrange for some organization to exhibit prepackaged propaganda on campus - that is lazy, and does a disservice to the UD community and the educational goals of this institution. You also know full well that when you start off from the position that people who choose to have abortions are the moral equivalents of Nazis and Klansmen, nobody is going to engage you in rational, dispassionate debate; somebody who claims to have been around a university for thirty years should know that. If I called you a Nazi, would you take me seriously? This isn't slander - own your actions, because you certainly were willing to yesterday.

And please, let's not have some self-serving nonsense about free speech - this isn't about that. I have no problem with free speech; I have a problem with dumb speech. This is a university, and as such it should be a place in which rational debate and intellectual pursuits are elevated above name-calling and histrionic comparisons with Nazis in which any fool can engage. You want to play in the muck and mire of the lowest levels of American politics, the inane drivel spewed by paid hacks who fail to distinguish between a woman's lawful control of her body and reproductive choices and an SS officer? Go do it elsewhere.

Your speech may be permissible, but it hardly was beneficial.

Anonymous
Fri May 6 2011 10:35
GAP first came to UD in 2003 so they were "tolerated even a few years ago." One of the signs specifically says they don't believe women who have had abortions are like Nazis. I can't help but think you are all offended by the signs and pictures because you do in fact believe they are dead human beings. If that's the case, how can you blame GAP for raising awareness about murder? Have any of you even talked to anyone from GAP or just judged from afar with your free comdoms?
Rich
Fri May 6 2011 10:28
It's hardly worth replying to these slanderous and unfounded accusations but since others may read them: To anonymous who complains that pro-life people at the display only make a "lazy appeal to emotion": I was at the display for around 90 minutes yesterday and not once was I approached by anyone to engage in any sort of dialogue. I and the others there would be glad to talk intellectually about abortion. Pampthlets are available with more detail and people are ready to discuss facts and figures. And I would point out that the signs carried by the counter-protesters were not exactly intellectually stimulating "Free condoms" and "Free hugs" etc. I've been around UD for 30 years and seen many kinds of protests. Your comments about this display just shows that you are opposed to freedom of speech for pro-life viewpoint. As far as "demonizing women" we had women who have had abortions there and come speak on campus. As far as "schmoozing" with the counter-protesters, I suppose you would complain of people being uncaring and unfriendly if they didn't talk to the other side. I talked to some from the other side, were they "schmoozing" with me? (and why is it OK for them to "schmooze" and not me?).
Tracy McQueen
Fri May 6 2011 06:53
Thank you Anonymous Poster just before this post, for your thoughts. There is so much to say about this disgusting display and you really nailed some of the most important issues. I wish you'd send a copy directly to Hullihen Hall and to President Harker. I think it was Fletcher Armstrong yesterday from "Center for Bio-Ethical Reform (sic)," who was glad-handing UD students (while wearing a UD hat!!!) and trying to schmooze with the counter-protestors. The UD counter-protestors have it right and I hope they didn't fall for any of his smooth talk. I doubt it -- they are way too intelligent for that. Anyway, thank you again!
Anonymous
Thu May 5 2011 23:52
These people wouldn't know genocide or fascism if it walked into the room and introduced itself explicitly and politely as such. All they know is how to make lazy appeals to emotion ("But it looks like a bbbbaby!!!!!!!!! Nazi!!!!!!!!!!!!"), they have no interest in actually examining or discussing the issue at hand in a rational or coherent fashion. Demonizing women as the moral equivalents of those who perpetrated the Holocaust or those who lynched people in this country is morally reprehensible, about as far from Christian in effect or intent as possible, and frankly UD administration should expect more of its student body and student groups. I really doubt that this sort of nonsense would have been tolerated on the Green in front of Hullihen Hall even a few years ago. That it is now is not a sign of progress, but rather a sign of the increasing intellectual weakness of American society generally and UD students specifically, insofar as histrionic accusations of genocide somehow constitute meaningful dialogue, and of the failure of UD leadership to demand excellence and encourage responsible and rational examination of an important social question as presumably would befit an institution on a so-called "Path to Prominence."
Rich
Thu May 5 2011 17:51
Although we are on different sides, I am glad some UD students care enough to stage a counter-protest . Anonymous, "preaching" is a loaded term but some on your side are also "preaching". I'm posting the info. for all to see and check out if they are interested. I do wonder though if people truly believe in choice why are they against showing images of abortion or describing it or make ultrasound more available etc. Could it be that abortion is a multimillion dollar industry and there are some who do not want women dissuaded from it?
Anonymous
Wed May 4 2011 19:37
Rich -- you tell people to look at all these websites but I say to people who want to learn more -- talk to me tomorrow at the event -- I had an abortion, I don't regret it, I had children later, and I would do it all again the same way. Stop preaching to me!!!
Anonymous
Wed May 4 2011 11:50
^ can't be sure they do,but I certainly get off to it. see you there!






log out