City bill threatens student 'fests'
Amanda Lopez
Issue date: 11/16/07 Section: News
|
Primarily, the bill aims to alter the current definition of the code involving social gatherings which defines them as "any event which is exclusively contained on private property and makes no use of city streets, other than for lawful parking." Events would no longer be considered private when fees or donations are charged or when attendance surpasses 250 people.
The new bill decreases this number to 150 guests and includes a minimum fine of $200 for first offenses and $400 for additional offenses. If the property is rented, the owner of the home is within his or her rights to evict the current tenants.
Dan Greenland, city relations chairman for the Student Government Association, said he accidentally discovered the bill while attending a City Council meeting last month.
"They are obviously attacking students when they make bills like this," Greenland said. "If a party has 100-plus people, then I can understand. But adding an eviction notice is a bit harsh."
The city has proposed the bill in an effort to curb underage drinking and drunken activity which disturbs the community, he said.
Greenland said he sees similarities between the bill and the zero-tolerance policy, which stirred campus-wide controversy in 2006.
"It is obviously not as big as zero tolerance," he said. "But the implications of the bill will not simply affect large block parties. I think this bill is just another chip at degrading civil rights for students."
Mayor Vance A. Funk III said such block-party events would have a hard time gaining a permit for this coming spring even if a bill such as this was voted out.
"There were a number of intoxicated students at last year's Chapelfest," Funk said. "A major highway was blocked and there were a few incidents that would make having that event again rather embarrassing."
2008 Woodie Awards




Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 24
Judy
posted 11/16/07 @ 8:04 AM EST
I do not understand how Chapelfest and other fests are a student right. How is loud noise, public urination, drunk and disorderly conduct and parties completely out of control a right? Chapelfest is the worst offender, because it does spill out onto the street, creating a real danger for motorists and a terrible situation for residents and surrounding businesses. (Continued…)
Lisa P.
posted 11/16/07 @ 8:53 AM EST
There is no such thing as your "right" to party except in a Beastie Boys song. Just maybe, if year after year, students didn't prove town residents right by acting like drunken idiots and causing all kinds of ridiculous problems, your "right" to party would not be threatened. (Continued…)
Monica Dominguez Torres
posted 11/16/07 @ 10:12 AM EST
Students are Newark residents for only 4 years. 'Local non-student residents' are here for much longer than that... Of course they should be the only ones deciding about what's going on in the town they chose to live in on a permanent basis!!! They are the ones who have to stand the consequences of these parties year after year. (Continued…)
Lauren
posted 11/16/07 @ 10:12 AM EST
These comments are ridiculous. The residents of Newark should know what they're getting into when they move to a town that houses over 16,000 college students. (Continued…)
Phil
posted 11/16/07 @ 12:51 PM EST
The only reason this town exists is because of the university. The students of the university, who seem to have brighter futures then the people from around the city of newark, just want to have fun one time a year. (Continued…)
Lisa
posted 11/16/07 @ 3:35 PM EST
Listen to yourselves.....spoiled brats. I have been witness to these fests and the aftermath, students being taken to the hospital with alcohol poisoning, wounds from assaults from drunken brawls, property damage in the thousands, time and resources wasted by the police and emergency services to babysit and save you from yourselves because you can't practice any self-control. (Continued…)
Dan Greenland
posted 11/16/07 @ 4:27 PM EST
Let me clarify a few things for anyone who reads this because some aspects of why the SGA dislikes the bill are missing and because I am bad at interviews. (Continued…)
J D
posted 11/16/07 @ 4:32 PM EST
Ahhh, the folly of youth. If you refuse to obey the law and respect your community based on the "Everybody's doing it" rationale of countless middle school students, then you should not be surprised when adults step in and take your playthings away. (Continued…)
CWoods
posted 11/16/07 @ 9:33 PM EST
I think that the adults that are talking about "taking student's playthings away" are being naive to the point that the students of UD and their parents are pumping in more money to this community than any other source, aside from the multi-million dollar endowments that are bestowed upon this university by Dupont and Gore. (Continued…)
longtimeresident
posted 11/18/07 @ 5:58 PM EST
Fact: The non-student residents and UD students have to co-exist.
Fact: Current non-student residents are fed up with students, but students don't care. (Continued…)
Post a Comment