College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Cut throat majors, the true test of our futures after college

The trials and tribulations of a struggling communication major.

Sports Desk Editor

Published: Monday, December 7, 2009

Updated: Monday, December 7, 2009

Before I came to Delaware, I decided to change my major from English (which I had put on my application) to Communication. I want to be a journalist, and since this university does not offer journalism as a major, I researched communication, and it sounded like it might be the thing for me. I thought I would go on the broadcast journalism track, and all my college dreams would come true. Perfect.

Then I found out how one actually gets into the communication major. For those of you not familiar, students take four core classes and at the end of sophomore year, or whenever those four classes are finished, they let the top 100 people into the major. I have taken three out of four of these classes. All were held in lecture halls. And in these three classes, I have taken nine multiple choice tests. And this is where I see a huge problem.

I would say it’s understandable that the major can only take 100 people, but it’s really not. If there is such a high demand of students that not everyone can be accepted, and this has been happening for a few years, maybe, just maybe, they should expand the faculty and try to accommodate the demand. I doubt that this is going to happen, but it is worth mentioning.

So we’re back to only 100 people getting into the major. If this procedure is going to stay in place, changes need to be made, since this creates a number of problems.

Multiple choice tests tell nothing about a student, just that they study a lot and are good at tests. And considering it’s a communication major, I’m going to guess and say there are a lot of people vying for those 100 spots whose strengths lie in writing, rather than test-taking. I could be wrong, but if you look at the class average of the first exam in the Introduction to Communication Research Methods course this year, I would say I’m not too far off.

Professors say that students should always come to them, make themselves known, the usual spiel. But that’s not going to get them into the major. Having an intelligent conversation with a professor, no matter what they try and say, is not going to make a person’s test score go up. I’ve often heard that interested students who go to their professors do better, but I can tell you—I’m very interested in learning. I’m just bad at taking tests.

Ultimately, my biggest issue comes financially. I want to say I pay close to $30,000 a year when all is said and done to go to school here. I’m not paying this much money to play around with my future and not find out if I have gotten into the major until the end of my sophomore year. And then what if students don’t get in? Changing your major after sophomore year is difficult, and I’m sure there’s plenty of students who end up having to stay more than four years, which is more money being drained out of bank accounts.

So by all means, keep your 100 students in the communications major if that seems to be what’s best, but something needs to be done when it comes to going about how students actually get in.

Perhaps the major should have a separate application when applying to the school. This is probably a little bit more accurate than test scores. If students are transferring into the major, have them fill it out too. Keeping the idea of the classes would be okay, but spreading them out over two years is difficult.

Having smaller size classes with a mixture of tests and papers is another idea. There’s very little communication in these lecture classes, so a smaller class size would allow for a participation grade, and having both tests and papers would play to the strengths of both types of students in the classes.

Finally, just have some sort of interview process. This is a communication major after all, and if a student cannot speak or interact well, why should they be in the major? Tests don’t talk, but people do.
 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

11 comments

Anonymous
Tue Feb 2 2010 21:55
"The difficulty of any given subject is relative to the person in question, and the ease with which a person can perform in a given subject is dependent on a wide array of factors, such as household income, the quality of education received, genetic factors, family environment, etc."

Which is why at UD communications, business, sociology, and criminal justice are great for dumb, spoiled, histrionic white girls.

Anonymous
Tue Feb 2 2010 19:34
There is a noticeable bias among the comments which grant special prestige and respect to the hard sciences, while simultaneously not only dismissing communications as a valuable major, but going so far as to attacking those students who are in the major, suggesting that it is nothing more than a major for "dumb white girls," as one respondent said. Not only is this elevation of the hard sciences--and the disrespectful attacks on communications (and implicitly the social sciences in general)--unwarranted, but it is also very revealing of the mindset of the attackers. It reveals an attitude that engineering and chemistry, for example, are somehow intrinsically more important than understanding the intricate dynamics of human communications and the various corollaries of such understanding, such as the reasons for social inequity and the power imbalance present in contemporary industrialized nations. While the hard sciences are an important aspect of our civilization, so too are the social sciences; it is naive and uninformed to suggest that one is more important than the other. The communications major is far from being a major that just teaches you how to "write emails" and "make posters." It is also indicative of a large ego to think that communications is, ipso facto, "easy" and math or engineering is "hard." The difficulty of any given subject is relative to the person in question, and the ease with which a person can perform in a given subject is dependent on a wide array of factors, such as household income, the quality of education received, genetic factors, family environment, etc. To so arrogantly dismiss communications as a major for "dumb white girls" is childish, unintelligent, and rude.
Anonymous
Tue Feb 2 2010 19:17
In response to the comment posted on January 20:

The stereotypes that are radiating throughout this comment is extremely unsettling to me. Perhaps you should take a page out of a communication major's lecture book and learn a thing or two about the roots of discrimination. And if you think the study of communications is so futile, maybe you should recall arguably the greatest tool for society: language; which, by the way, is brought about by communication.

Squarepants
Tue Feb 2 2010 14:10
Communications? Cut-throat? That's rich. Just because the major has a low rate of acceptance doesn't mean that it is challenging or useful. Communication skills are an implicit part of most other majors, where you are regularly called upon to present your work to others, network with professors, and work in groups with your peers.
In my opinion, the reason for accepting so few students into the major is to avoid diluting the U.D. brand of students. As it is now, if employers look around and see that the majority of U.D. grads are business executives, CPA's, engineers, and scientists, then the college starts to look pretty good on a resume. Conversely, if more students were allowed to take communications as a major, then many more of our grads would be...well, unemployed.
If you're worried that your tuition is being wasted, try taking any science degree. Instead of being graded on your ability to write e-mails, speak, and make posters; you'll instead be graded on your abilities of intuition, reasoning, comprehension of abstract concepts, and effectiveness at problem solving. It's worth mentioning that starting salaries for those with technical degrees are in the $50k range, at the very least.

In all seriousness, there is very little use for a degree in communications. Just about anything that you could do with that degree could also be done with a bachelors in visual arts or business, and those cases, you'd have many more options open to you. Consider a switch, before it's too late.

Anonymous
Sat Jan 30 2010 14:15
Haha yea, and criminal justice and sociology are just getting too competitive... wow...
Dumps McGee
Wed Jan 27 2010 14:33
consider yourself lucky if you didn't get in. the major is completely useless. i graduated in 2007 with a B.A in communications which has yet to land me a job. its now 2010 and I'm going back to school to learn something more important then friggen theories about people in which none are proven. Everyone has a different theory about something. my theory is that communications is a useless study unless your a damn alien from outer space who has no idea why, how, or what people are looking for when interacting with each other. unless you hide behind a computer or a robot all day id be willing to bet 90 percent of people have a pretty good idea what someone needs, wants, or desires when communicating with another person. the other 10% are mentally or physically disabled (sorry if I offended anyone thats not my intention).
Your name
Wed Jan 20 2010 19:25
Your name:

Seriously? Maybe no 'job' is intrinsically superior to another, but majors in college are. Comm exists so dumb white girls can get a semi-respectable degree that (GASP!) they might fail to attain if they went for math or engineering. So forgive me, if I seem a little hostile to the idea that comm majors are somehow treated unfairly, but no comm major has ever had to produce a new and useful tool for society at large to use.

Your name
Fri Jan 1 2010 23:20
In response to the comment posted by "reality":

Before offering derogatory commentary about those in the communication major, it might be useful for you to consider the source of your hostility and arrogance. It seems you are implying that communication is an inferior area of study. To then proceed to mock "maintenance engineering" is unwarranted and simply rude. All jobs serve important roles, and to suggest that one job is "superior" than another demonstrates a lack of understanding of just how interdependent we all are. It is indeed true that the most critical jobs and functions in society are often the ones that are least rewarded and respected. It seems like you have some issues to resolve with your ego.

reality
Thu Dec 31 2009 04:08
No offense, but communications is your idea of "cut throat"? What do you drop down to from there, maintenance engineering?
Heather
Thu Dec 10 2009 03:42
While I do understand that different people have different strengths and weaknesses and that it is important to grade students in a variety of ways (including written exams, papers, projects, and speeches/presentations whenever possible), you also need to understand the realities of this University. The University is a business. It needs to bring in more money than it spends and clearly it would be incredibly expensive to break up those huge classes into smaller ones that would make it feasible for professors or TAs to grade written assignments. I am a Marketing/Management double major. Those are not majors that can really be tested particularly well with multiple choice questions either, but that was how I was graded my first year or two here. We all start out in some huge lecture hall style classes. My freshman year I was in a lecture class of 400 people! The University is just trying to weed out the students who can't step up and get the job done before wasting valuable time on them in a major where they will not be able to succeed. The easiest way to do this is through multiple choice exams. I will admit that I do not know much about the communication major, so I don't know what types of assignments or classes you have once you get into the major. Speaking from my experience, however, this is just sort of how it needs to be unless you want the University to raise tuition prices (and I mean raise them a whole lot) so you can have classes of 30 students your freshman and sophomore year. Test taking is an important college skill, so just like oral communication skills and written communication skills, it is something students need to work on and need to be able to do well in order to be successful in a college environment.
Lauren
Tue Dec 8 2009 03:52
i completely agree!!






log out